- The feature is GA so there's no feature gate so it doesn't need any
special label now.
- The test is not dual-stack-specific, so it shouldn't claim to be.
- It asserted node-IP-assigning behavior that is not guaranteed to
work on all clouds. (Among other things: that there are no "extra"
InternalIPs, and that there are InternalIPs of every supported IP
family, rather than there only being ExternalIPs of some families.)
* fix pods tracking and internal error checking in statefulset tests
* fix stateful set pod recreation and event spam
- do not emit events when pod reaches terminal phase
- do not try to recreate pod until the old pod has been removed from
etcd storage
* fix conflict race in statefulset rest update
statefulset controller does less requests per sync now and thus can
reconcile status faster, thus resulting in a higher chance for conflicts
Even if the textlogger which writes to Ginkgo is installed as the logger in
klog, klog still does some verbosity checks itself (for example,
klog.V().Enabled).
Therefore the framework has to keep the verbosity settings in the textlogger
and in klog consistent. This is done by wrapping the Set call instead of
replacing it.
When using structured parameters, the instance name must match and not be in
use already.
NodeUnprepareResources must be called with the same handle are
NodePrepareResources.
* Add e2e tests for Service.spec.trafficDistribution
* Fix linting issue
* Fix spelling
* Add integration tests for trafficDistribution
* Use nodeSelection instead of nodeName to schedule pods on a specific zonal node
* Fix import alias corev1 -> v1 in e2e test
* Address comments
* Add a way to only print log lines in case of errors. This is deemed to be good behaviour by e2e tests guidelines
While currently those objects only get published by the kubelet for node-local
resources, this could change once we also support network-attached
resources. Dropping the "Node" prefix enables such a future extension.
The NodeName in ResourceSlice and StructuredResourceHandle then becomes
optional. The kubelet still needs to provide one and it must match its own node
name, otherwise it doesn't have permission to access ResourceSlice objects.
The information is received from the DRA driver plugin through a new gRPC
streaming interface. This is backwards compatible with old DRA driver kubelet
plugins, their gRPC server will return "not implemented" and that can be
handled by kubelet. Therefore no API break is needed.
However, DRA drivers need to be updated because the Go API changed. They can
return
status.New(codes.Unimplemented, "no node resource support").Err()
if they don't support the new ListAndWatchResources method and
structured parameters.
The controller in kubelet then synchronizes this information from the driver
with NodeResourceSlice objects, creating, updating and deleting them as needed.
If the resource handle has data from a structured parameter model, then we need
to pass that to the DRA driver kubelet plugin. Because Kubernetes uses
gogo/protobuf, we cannot use "optional" for that new optional field and have to
resort to "repeated" with a single repetition if present.
This is a new, backwards-compatible field.
That extending the resource.k8s.io changes the checksum of a kubelet checkpoint
is unfortunate. Updating the test cases is a stop-gap measure, the actual
solution will have to be something else before beta.
