Invalid flags are detected by flag parsing, but optional arguments are just
passed through to the E2E suites. None of them support any, so rejecting them
with an error message is useful because it helps catch typos (like a missing
hyphen before a flag).
perfdash expects all data items to have the same set of labels. It then
renders drop-down buttons for each label with all values found for each
label. Previously, data items that didn't have a label didn't match any label
filter in perfdash and couldn't get selected because perfdash doesn't have
"unset" in it's drop-down menus.
To avoid that, scheduler-perf now collects all labels and then adds missing
labels with "not applicable" as value:
{
"data": {
"Average": 939.7071223010004,
"Perc50": 927.7987421383649,
"Perc90": 2166.153846153846,
"Perc95": 2363.076923076923,
"Perc99": 2520.6153846153848
},
"unit": "ms",
"labels": {
"Metric": "scheduler_pod_scheduling_duration_seconds",
"Name": "SchedulingBasic/5000Nodes/namespace-2",
"extension_point": "not applicable",
"result": "not applicable"
}
},
...
{
"data": {
"Average": 1.1172570650000004,
"Perc50": 1.1418367346938776,
"Perc90": 1.5500000000000003,
"Perc95": 1.6410256410256412,
"Perc99": 3.7333333333333334
},
"unit": "ms",
"labels": {
"Metric": "scheduler_framework_extension_point_duration_seconds",
"Name": "SchedulingBasic/5000Nodes/namespace-2",
"extension_point": "Score",
"result": "not applicable"
}
},
Because the JSON file gets written at the end of the top-level benchmark, all
data items had `BenchmarkPerfScheduling/` as prefix in the `Name` label. This
is redundant and makes it harder to see the actual name. Now that common prefix
gets removed.
CreatePod and MakePod only accepted an `isPrivileged` boolean, which made it
impossible to write tests using those helpers which work in a default
framework.Framework, because the default there is LevelRestricted.
The simple boolean gets replaced with admissionapi.Level. Passing
LevelRestricted does the same as calling e2epod.MixinRestrictedPodSecurity.
Instead of explicitly passing a constant to these modified helpers, most tests
get updated to pass f.NamespacePodSecurityLevel. This has the advantage
that if that level gets lowered in the future, tests only need to be updated in
one place.
In some cases, helpers taking client+namespace+timeouts parameters get replaced
with passing the Framework instance to get access to
f.NamespacePodSecurityEnforceLevel. These helpers don't need separate
parameters because in practice all they ever used where the values from the
Framework instance.
The post merge job was failed https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/117103
and this causes the e2e tests to fail. This PR retrigger the same.
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <humble.devassy@gmail.com>
The namespace the crictical pod was referring to was wrong, because it
was using the generated one instead of `kube-system`. This and the
resulting test condition is now fixed.
The test seems to run only in `ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-flaky` for now.
Closes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/109296
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
Doing the initialization once was not good enough because it was not guaranteed
that RunCustomEtcd gets called early enough, before there are other goroutines
which use gRPC. The data race for
test/integration/apiserver.TestWatchCacheUpdatedByEtcd was:
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00000cfffb90 by goroutine 140052:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.V()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/grpclog.go:41 +0x30
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.(*componentData).V()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/component.go:103 +0x4e
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*http2Client).Close()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:955 +0xca
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.(*http2Client).reader()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:1619 +0xbfb
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport.newHTTP2Client.func11()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/internal/transport/http2_client.go:394 +0x47
Previous write at 0x00000cfffb90 by goroutine 145643:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog.SetLoggerV2()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/google.golang.org/grpc/grpclog/loggerv2.go:75 +0x104
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework.RunCustomEtcd.func2()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework/etcd.go:157 +0x33
sync.(*Once).doSlow()
/usr/local/go/src/sync/once.go:74 +0x101
sync.(*Once).Do()
/usr/local/go/src/sync/once.go:65 +0x46
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework.RunCustomEtcd()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework/etcd.go:156 +0xb97
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver.multiEtcdSetup()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver/watchcache_test.go:41 +0xc4
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver.TestWatchCacheUpdatedByEtcd()
/home/prow/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/apiserver/watchcache_test.go:92 +0xa9
testing.tRunner()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1576 +0x216
testing.(*T).Run.func1()
/usr/local/go/src/testing/testing.go:1629 +0x47
This commit removes the legacy networkpolicy tests since they now have
complete appropriate coverage in the new netpol suite.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Stoycos <astoycos@redhat.com>
We have a e2e test which want to get a rate limit error. To do so, we
sent an abnormally high amount of calls in a tight loop.
The relevant test per se is reportedly fine, but wwe need to play nicer
with *other* tests which may run just after and which need to query the API.
If the testsuite runs "too fast", it's possible an innocent test falls in the
same rate limit watch period which was saturated by the ratelimit test,
so the innocent test can still be throttled because the throttling period
is not exhausted yet, yielding false negatives, leading to flakes.
We can't reset the period for the rate limit, we just wait "long enough" to
make sure we absorb the burst and other legit queries are not rejected.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
This releases the underlying resource sooner and ensures that another consumer
can get scheduled without being influenced by a decision that was made for the
previous consumer.
An alternative would have been to have the apiserver trigger the deallocation
whenever it sees the `status.reservedFor` getting reduced to zero. But that
then also triggers deallocation when kube-scheduler removes the last
reservation after a failed scheduling cycle. In that case we want to keep the
claim allocated and let the kube-scheduler decide on a case-by-case basis which
claim should get deallocated.
add integration test to wait for json without value
refactor JSON condition value parsing and validating
adjusting test to reflect the error message refactoring
ginkgo.By should be used for steps in the test flow. Creating and deleting CDI
files happens in parallel to that. If reported via ginkgo.By, progress reports
look weird because they contain e.g. step "waiting for...." (from the main
test, which is still on-going) and end with "creating CDI file" (which is
already completed).
This avoids the surprise of identical authorization checks within a
policy evaluating to different decisions during the same admission
pass, and reduces the overhead of repeatedly referencing the same
authorization check.
This runs workloads that are labeled as "integration-test". The apiserver and
scheduler are only started once per unique configuration, followed by each
workload using that configuration. This makes execution faster. In contrast to
benchmarking, we care less about starting with a clean slate for each test.
Merely deleting the namespace is not enough:
- Workloads might rely on the garbage collector to get rid of obsolete objects,
so we should run it to be on the safe side.
- Pods must be force-deleted because kubelet is not running.
- Finally, the namespace controller is needed to get rid of
deleted namespaces.
* Skip terminal Pods with a deletion timestamp from the Daemonset sync
Change-Id: I64a347a87c02ee2bd48be10e6fff380c8c81f742
* Review comments and fix integration test
Change-Id: I3eb5ec62bce8b4b150726a1e9b2b517c4e993713
* Include deleted terminal pods in history
Change-Id: I8b921157e6be1c809dd59f8035ec259ea4d96301
* test comment should match the code in podgc
* Update test/integration/podgc/podgc_test.go
Co-authored-by: Michał Woźniak <mimowo@users.noreply.github.com>
* test comment should match the code in podgc
---------
Co-authored-by: Michał Woźniak <mimowo@users.noreply.github.com>
The exception comments were added due to a false positive in
staticcheck. This has since been rectified.
Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
The failure message becomes nicer. Found with the new ginkgolinter, for
example:
test/e2e/apps/cronjob.go:113:3: ginkgo-linter: wrong length assertion; consider using `gomega.Expect(jobs.Items).To(gomega.BeEmpty())` instead (ginkgolinter)
gomega.Expect(jobs.Items).To(gomega.HaveLen(0))
^
The failure message becomes a bit nicer. Found by the new ginkgolinter, for
example:
test/e2e/windows/memory_limits.go:160:2: ginkgo-linter: wrong boolean assertion; consider using `gomega.Eventually(ctx, func() bool {
eventList, err := f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Events(f.Namespace.Name).List(ctx, metav1.ListOptions{})
...
}, 3*time.Minute, 10*time.Second).Should(gomega.BeTrue())` instead (ginkgolinter)
"gomega.Expect" is not the same as "assert" in C: it always has to be combined
with a statement of what is expected.
Found with the new ginkgolinter, for example:
test/e2e/node/pod_resize.go:242:3: ginkgo-linter: "Expect": missing assertion method. Expected "Should()", "To()", "ShouldNot()", "ToNot()" or "NotTo()" (ginkgolinter)
gomega.Expect(found == true)
NOTE: we are not installing the ecr-credential-provider binary
itself here we are, we need to do it out-of-band from the test
suite itself before it runs.
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Previously, we were trying to patch the deployment's ready replicas by
changing it to 0, at the same time we have 2 available replicas.
Therefore, this test fails since the ready replicas is less than the
available replicas. As a fix, we make the number of ready replicas equals to the number
of available ones.
Signed-off-by: AhmedGrati <ahmedgrati1999@gmail.com>
Each benchmark test case runs with a fresh etcd instance. Therefore it is not
necessary to delete objects after a run.
A future unit test might reuse etcd, therefore cleanup is optional.
Added NodeAlphaFeature:DynamicResourceAllocation to the Node DRA test
to fix failing containerd serial jobs. Those jobs skip tests labeled
with NodeAlphaFeature.
Removed NodeFeature:DynamicResourceAllocation label from the
tests to fix cos-cgroupv1/v2-containerd-node-e2e-serial CI jobs.
It turned out that labeling DRA Node tests as NodeFeature was
a mistake. Re-labeling with NodeAlphaFeature would not work either.
It would fail certain containerd jobs as DRA requires containerd >= 1.7
When running iscsi test, use dbus socket from the host. targetcli uses the
socket for synchronization.
Recent Fedoras can run dbus only via systemd, which is cumbersome here.
Once DeferCleanup for the worker goroutine is invoked, there's no need to
continue doing anything anymore in that goroutine and it can return
immediately, without reporting the "context canceled" error because there is no
other reason for that.
This test requires consistent CPU consumption for 3 minutes
to pass. Consumption on a single Pod is more consistent than
split across multiple Pods: no temporary usage drops in aggregate.
Ginkgo changed the noColor command line arg to be no-color and will
issue the following warning:
You're using deprecated Ginkgo functionality:
=============================================
--noColor is deprecated, use --no-color instead
Fix this by changing all occurrences accordingly.
