Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add Events for operation_executor to show status of mounts, failed/successful to show in describe events
Fixes#27590
@saad-ali @pmorie @erinboyd
After talking with @pmorie last week about the above issue, I decided to poke around and see if I could remedy. The refactoring broke my previous UXP merged PR's that correctly showed failed mount errors in the describe events. However, Not sure I implemented correctly, but it tested out and seems to be working, let me know what I missed or if this is not the correct approach.
```
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
2m 2m 1 {default-scheduler } Normal Scheduled Successfully assigned nfs-bb-pod1 to 127.0.0.1
44s 44s 1 {kubelet 127.0.0.1} Warning FailedMount Unable to mount volumes for pod "nfs-bb-pod1_default(a94f64f1-37c9-11e6-9aa5-52540073d346)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "nfs-bb-pod1"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[nfsvol]
44s 44s 1 {kubelet 127.0.0.1} Warning FailedSync Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "nfs-bb-pod1"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[nfsvol]
38s 38s 1 {kubelet } Warning FailedMount Unable to mount volumes for pod "a94f64f1-37c9-11e6-9aa5-52540073d346": Mount failed: exit status 32
Mounting arguments: nfs1.rhs:/opt/data99 /var/lib/kubelet/pods/a94f64f1-37c9-11e6-9aa5-52540073d346/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/nfsvol nfs []
Output: mount.nfs: Connection timed out
Resolution hint: Check and make sure the NFS Server exists (ensure that correct IPAddress/Hostname was given) and is available/reachable.
Also make sure firewall ports are open on both client and NFS Server (2049 v4 and 2049, 20048 and 111 for v3).
Use commands telnet <nfs server> <port> and showmount <nfs server> to help test connectivity.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cut the client repo, staging it in the main repo
Tracking issue: #28559
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/25978#issuecomment-232710174
This PR implements the plan a few of us came up with last week for cutting client into its own repo:
1. creating "_staging" (name is tentative) directory in the main repo, using a script to copy the client and its dependencies to this directory
2. periodically publishing the contents of this staging client to k8s.io/client-go repo
3. converting k8s components in the main repo to use the staged client. They should import the staged client as if the client were vendored. (i.e., the import line should be `import "k8s.io/client-go/<pacakge name>`). This requirement is to ease step 4.
4. In the future, removing the staging area, and vendoring the real client-go repo.
The advantage of having the staging area is that we can continuously run integration/e2e tests with the latest client repo and the latest main repo, without waiting for the client repo to be vendored back into the main repo. This staging area will exist until our test matrix is vendoring both the client and the server.
In the above plan, the tricky part is step 3. This PR achieves it by creating a symlink under ./vendor, pointing to the staging area, so packages in the main repo can refer to the client repo as if it's vendored. To prevent the godep tool from messing up the staging area, we export the staged client to GOPATH in hack/godep-save.sh so godep will think the client packages are local and won't attempt to manage ./vendor/k8s.io/client-go.
This is a POC. We'll rearrange the directory layout of the client before merge.
@thockin @lavalamp @bgrant0607 @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29147)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rewrite service controller to apply best controller pattern
This PR is a long term solution for #21625:
We apply the same pattern like replication controller to service controller to avoid the potential process order messes in service controller, the change includes:
1. introduce informer controller to watch service changes from kube-apiserver, so that every changes on same service will be kept in serviceStore as the only element.
2. put the service name to be processed to working queue
3. when process service, always get info from serviceStore to ensure the info is up-to-date
4. keep the retry mechanism, sleep for certain interval and add it back to queue.
5. remote the logic of reading last service info from kube-apiserver before processing the LB info as we trust the info from serviceStore.
The UT has been passed, manual test passed after I hardcode the cloud provider as FakeCloud, however I am not able to boot a k8s cluster with any available cloudprovider, so e2e test is not done.
Submit this PR first for review and for triggering a e2e test.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add configz.InstallHandler in controllermanager.go
I think it should add configz.InstallHandler for Run function in controllermanager.go.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
two optimization for StartControllers in controllermanager.go
The PR changed two places to optimise StartControllers function in controllermanager.go.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller-manager support number of garbage collector workers to be configurable
The number of garbage collector workers of controller-manager is a fixed value 5 now, make it configurable should more properly
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kube-controller-manager: Add configure-cloud-routes option
This allows kube-controller-manager to allocate CIDRs to nodes (with
allocate-node-cidrs=true), but will not try to configure them on the
cloud provider, even if the cloud provider supports Routes.
The default is configure-cloud-routes=true, and it will only try to
configure routes if allocate-node-cidrs is also configured, so the
default behaviour is unchanged.
This is useful because on AWS the cloud provider configures routes by
setting up VPC routing table entries, but there is a limit of 50
entries. So setting configure-cloud-routes on AWS would allow us to
continue to allocate node CIDRs as today, but replace the VPC
route-table mechanism with something not limited to 50 nodes.
We can't just turn off the cloud-provider entirely because it also
controls other things - node discovery, load balancer creation etc.
Fix#25602
This allows kube-controller-manager to allocate CIDRs to nodes (with
allocate-node-cidrs=true), but will not try to configure them on the
cloud provider, even if the cloud provider supports Routes.
The default is configure-cloud-routes=true, and it will only try to
configure routes if allocate-node-cidrs is also configured, so the
default behaviour is unchanged.
This is useful because on AWS the cloud provider configures routes by
setting up VPC routing table entries, but there is a limit of 50
entries. So setting configure-cloud-routes on AWS would allow us to
continue to allocate node CIDRs as today, but replace the VPC
route-table mechanism with something not limited to 50 nodes.
We can't just turn off the cloud-provider entirely because it also
controls other things - node discovery, load balancer creation etc.
Fix#25602
Split controller cache into actual and desired state of world.
Controller will only operate on volumes scheduled to nodes that
have the "volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach" annotation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
vSphere Volume Plugin Implementation
This PR implements vSphere Volume plugin support in Kubernetes (ref. issue #23932).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor persistent volume controller
Here is complete persistent controller as designed in https://github.com/pmorie/pv-haxxz/blob/master/controller.go
It's feature complete and compatible with current binder/recycler/provisioner. No new features, it *should* be much more stable and predictable.
Testing
--
The unit test framework is quite complicated, still it was necessary to reach reasonable coverage (78% in `persistentvolume_controller.go`). The untested part are error cases, which are quite hard to test in reasonable way - sure, I can inject a VersionConflictError on any object update and check the error bubbles up to appropriate places, but the real test would be to run `syncClaim`/`syncVolume` again and check it recovers appropriately from the error in the next periodic sync. That's the hard part.
Organization
---
The PR starts with `rm -rf kubernetes/pkg/controller/persistentvolume`. I find it easier to read when I see only the new controller without old pieces scattered around.
[`types.go` from the old controller is reused to speed up matching a bit, the code looks solid and has 95% unit test coverage].
I tried to split the PR into smaller patches, let me know what you think.
~~TODO~~
--
* ~~Missing: provisioning, recycling~~.
* ~~Fix integration tests~~
* ~~Fix e2e tests~~
@kubernetes/sig-storage
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24331)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#15632
Automatic merge from submit-queue
update controllers watching all pods to share an informer
This plumbs the shared pod informer through the various controllers to avoid duplicated watches.
