Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41306, 42187, 41666, 42275, 42266)
Implement bulk polling of volumes
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
cc @justinsb
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
pv_controller: Do not report exponential backoff as error.
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
This just pollutes logs without any useful information:
```
E0214 08:00:30.428073 77288 pv_controller.go:1410] error scheduling operaion "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]": Failed to create operation with name "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]". An operation with that name failed at 2017-02-14 08:00:15.631133152 -0500 EST. No retries permitted until 2017-02-14 08:00:31.631133152 -0500 EST (16s). Last error: "Cannot delete the volume \"11a4faea-bfc7-4713-88b3-dec492480dba\", it's still attached to a node".
```
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
changes to cleanup the volume plugin for recycle
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Code cleanup. Changing from creating a new interface from the plugin, that then calls a function to recycle a volume, to adding the function to the plugin itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#26230
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Took same approach from closed PR #28432.
Do you want the approach to be the same for NewDeleter(), NewMounter(), NewUnMounter() and should they be in this same PR or submit different PR's for those?
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alpha provisioning
This is the first part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/36
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha version of dynamic volume provisioning is removed in this release. Annotation
"volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class" does not have any special meaning. A default storage class
and DefaultStorageClass admission plugin can be used to preserve similar behavior of Kubernetes cluster,
see https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/persistent-volumes/#class-1 for details.
```
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40126, 40565, 38777, 40564, 40572)
Do not swallow error in asw.updateNodeStatusUpdateNeeded
Ref #39056
Bubble the error up to `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded` and log it out.
NOTE: This does not modify interface of `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39628, 39551, 38746, 38352, 39607)
Increasing times on reconciling volumes fixing impact to AWS.
#**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We are currently blocked by API timeouts with PV volumes. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39526. This is a workaround, not a fix.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A second PR will be dropped with CLI cobra options in it, but we are starting with increasing the reconciliation periods. I am dropping this without major testing and will test on our AWS account. Will be marked WIP until I run smoke tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Provide kubernetes-controller-manager flags to control volume attach/detach reconciler sync. The duration of the syncs can be controlled, and the syncs can be shut off as well.
```
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
Exponential back off when volume delete fails
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements ability in pv_controller to back off when deleting a volume fails from plugin API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Partly fixes#38295 , but I think volume delete is most problematic thing happening in pv_controller without any sort of backoff.
After this change the attempts of volume deletion look like:
```
controller : I1208 00:18:35.532061 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:20:50.578325 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:23:05.563488 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:25:20.599158 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:27:35.560009 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:29:50.594967 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:32:05.539168 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:34:20.581665 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
```
This implements pv_controller to exponentially backoff
when deleting a volume fails in Cloud API. It ensures that
we aren't making too many calls to Cloud API
This adds tests for code introduced here :
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26994
Via integration test we can now verify that if pod delete
event is somehow missed by AttachDetach controller - it still
get cleaned up by Desired State of World populator.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Fix issue #37377: Report an event on successful PVC provisioning
This is a simple patch to fix the issue #37377: On a successful PVC provisioning an event is emitted so it's clear the provisioning actually succeeded.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded whenever nodeAdd event is received
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Bug fix and SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded for a node whenever its api object is added. This is to ensure that we don't lose the attached list of volumes in the node when its api object is deleted and recreated.
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37586https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37585
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller manager refactors
The controller manager needs some significant cleanup. This starts us down the patch by respecting parameters like `stopCh`, simplifying discovery checks, removing unnecessary parameters, preventing unncessary fatals, and using our client builder.
@sttts @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix kubectl Stratigic Merge Patch compatibility
As @smarterclayton pointed out in [comment1](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35647#pullrequestreview-8290820) and [comment2](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35647#pullrequestreview-8290847) in PR #35647,
we cannot assume the API servers publish version and they shares the same version.
This PR removes all the calls of GetServerSupportedSMPatchVersion().
Change the behavior of `apply` and `edit` to:
Retrying with the old patch version, if the new version fails.
Default other usage of SMPatch to the new version, since they don't update list of primitives.
fixes#36916
cc: @pwittrock @smarterclayton
This PR is to fix the issue in converting aws volume id from mount
paths. Currently there are three aws volume id formats supported. The
following lists example of those three formats and their corresponding
global mount paths:
1. aws:///vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/aws-ebs/mounts/aws/vol-123456)
2. aws://us-east-1/vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/mounts/aws/us-est-1/vol-123455)
3. vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/mounts/aws/us-est-1/vol-123455)
For the first two cases, we need to check the mount path and convert
them back to the original format.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type with merge sementic
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type when the patch strategy is `merge`.
Before: we cannot replace or delete an item in a list of primitive, e.g. string, when the patch strategy is `merge`. It will always append new items to the list.
This patch will generate a map to update the list of primitive type.
The server with this patch will accept either a new patch or an old patch.
The client will found out the APIserver version before generate the patch.
Fixes#35163, #32398
cc: @pwittrock @fabianofranz
``` release-note
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type when patch strategy is `merge` to remove deleted objects.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Better messaging for missing volume binaries on host
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When mount binaries are not present on a host, the error returned is a generic one.
This change is to check the mount binaries before the mount and return a user-friendly error message.
This change is specific to GCI and the flag is experimental now.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36098
**Release note**:
Introduces a flag `check-node-capabilities-before-mount` which if set, enables a check (`CanMount()`) prior to mount operations to verify that the required components (binaries, etc.) to mount the volume are available on the underlying node. If the check is enabled and `CanMount()` returns an error, the mount operation fails. Implements the `CanMount()` check for NFS.
Sample output post change :
rkouj@rkouj0:~/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes$ kubectl describe pods
Name: sleepyrc-fzhyl
Namespace: default
Node: e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa/10.240.0.3
Start Time: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:28:36 -0800
Labels: name=sleepy
Status: Pending
IP:
Controllers: ReplicationController/sleepyrc
Containers:
sleepycontainer1:
Container ID:
Image: gcr.io/google_containers/busybox
Image ID:
Port:
Command:
sleep
6000
QoS Tier:
cpu: Burstable
memory: BestEffort
Requests:
cpu: 100m
State: Waiting
Reason: ContainerCreating
Ready: False
Restart Count: 0
Environment Variables:
Conditions:
Type Status
Initialized True
Ready False
PodScheduled True
Volumes:
data:
Type: NFS (an NFS mount that lasts the lifetime of a pod)
Server: 127.0.0.1
Path: /export
ReadOnly: false
default-token-d13tj:
Type: Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
SecretName: default-token-d13tj
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
7s 7s 1 {default-scheduler } Normal Scheduled Successfully assigned sleepyrc-fzhyl to e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa
6s 3s 4 {kubelet e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa} Warning FailedMount Unable to mount volume kubernetes.io/nfs/32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002-data (spec.Name: data) on pod sleepyrc-fzhyl (UID: 32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002). Verify that your node machine has the required components before attempting to mount this volume type. Required binary /sbin/mount.nfs is missing
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
