Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42058, 41160, 42065, 42076, 39338)
New command for stand-alone GKE certificates controller
New stand-alone certificates controller for GKE. Rather than requiring the CA's private key on disk, this allows making external calls to GKE in order to sign cluster certificates.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#39761
**Release note**:
```release-note
New GKE certificates controller.
```
CC @mikedanese @jcbsmpsn
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
Don't restrict etcd on self host installs b/c a clipped etcd can have
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove cpu-clipping from self hosted etcd install from the masters.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
preflight check external etcd version when kubeadm init
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. preflight check if verson of external etcd server meets the demand of kubeadm, currently requires >= 3.0.14
2. support mixed http endpoints and https endpoints
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/174
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
i have tested against single endpoint including http etcd server , https etcd server, but multiple endpoints not tested yet. i'll do it tomorrow
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
kubeadm: Secure the control plane communication and add the kubeconfig phase command
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This generates kubeconfig files for the controller-manager and the scheduler, ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/172
The second commit adds the `kubeadm alpha phase kubeconfig` command as described in the design doc: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/pull/156
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@dmmcquay What kind of tests would you like for the kubeconfig phase command?
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@jbeda @mikedanese @dmmcquay @pires @liggitt @deads2k @errordeveloper
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41857, 41864, 40522, 41835, 41991)
kubeadm: Demote --self-hosted to master config file.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
kubeadm init --self-hosted was meant to be a short lived hack to enable self-hosted deployments until we're ready to make them the default. Rather than shipping this in 1.6 (for the first time) we will move this to the config file as it is presently only an advanced feature, leaving us with more well supported ways to remove it in the future.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
CC @luxas @pires @errordeveloper @dmmcquay
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41857, 41864, 40522, 41835, 41991)
kubeadm: Use a new label for marking and tainting the master node
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39112 for kubeadm until that PR is merged. I want to proceed on this stuff, it has been pending for too long already.
It's at least pretty safe to apply this for kubeadm now, since we're still in alpha in v1.6 implementation-wise, only the CLI will be beta.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Switch to the `node-role.kubernetes.io/master` label for marking and tainting the master node in kubeadm
```
cc @deads2k @liggitt @smarterclayton @jbeda @roberthbailey @mikedanese @justinsb @sttts @kubernetes/api-approvers @kubernetes/api-reviewers
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41857, 41864, 40522, 41835, 41991)
kubeadm: update token separator to '.'
**What this PR does / why we need it**: From SIG meetings, it was agreed upon to have '.' be the separator for tokens. This PR updates that.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @jbeda
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add client-ca to configmap in kube-public
Client CA information is not secret and it's required for any API server trying to terminate a TLS connection. This pull adds the information to configmaps in `kube-public` that look like this:
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
data:
client-ca.crt: |
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
requestheader-allowed-names: '["system:auth-proxy"]'
requestheader-client-ca-file: |
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
requestheader-extra-headers-prefix: '["X-Remote-Extra-"]'
requestheader-group-headers: '["X-Remote-Group"]'
requestheader-username-headers: '["X-Remote-User"]'
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
creationTimestamp: 2017-02-22T17:54:37Z
name: extension-apiserver-authentication
namespace: kube-system
resourceVersion: "6"
selfLink: /api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/configmaps/extension-apiserver-authentication
uid: fa1dd328-f927-11e6-8b0e-28d2447dc82b
```
@kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @liggitt @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @lavalamp @sttts
There will need to be a corresponding pull for permissions
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40932, 41896, 41815, 41309, 41628)
enable DefaultTolerationSeconds admission controller by default
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Continuation of PR #41414, enable DefaultTolerationSeconds admission controller by default.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes: #41860
related Issue: #1574, #25320
related PRs: #34825, #41133, #41414
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
enable DefaultTolerationSeconds admission controller by default
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41621, 41946, 41941, 41250, 41729)
Refactor printers and describers into their own package.
This sets the stage for using printer code from the server side (decoupled from kubectl) and loosens the coupling between kubectl and the printers. `pkg/printers` contains interfaces and has an import restriction against pulling in API specific code, while `pkg/printers/internalversion` can be used for internal types.
Add a method on `Factory` for retrieving PrinterForCommand which uses the Scheme and RESTMapper from the Factory, not the hardcoded ones. This further separates kubectl from the core API scheme and allows better composition.
Change NamePrinter to use RESTMapper (previously it was hardcoding those conversions). This means that we now return plural resource names (`pods/foo`) but is correct once aliases and shortnames start being returned by the mapper.
This is a prerequisite for server side get, but is pure refactor (contains no new features).
@deads2k @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)
Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API
v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.
~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.
**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.
Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40665, 41094, 41351, 41721, 41843)
kubeadm: Add a --ca-cert-path flag to kubeadm join
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR makes it possible to customize where the CA file is written
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@pires @mikedanese @dmmcquay @jbeda @errordeveloper
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40665, 41094, 41351, 41721, 41843)
parse single string as group rather than version
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Prevent bad code generation by adjusting parsing of input.
When client-gen is run with `--input` as an unversioned type, it blows up if the group does not end with a trailing slash.
examples
1. `--input servicecatalog/v1alpha` is group servicecatalog, with version v1alpha1
1. `--input servicecatalog/` is group servicecatalog, with version empty string
1. `--input servicecatalog` is group empty string, with version servicecatalog
I disagree that the second and third cases are different. This adjusts them so they are both case 2.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
This change would address the concerns in PR https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/343
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@caesarxuchao @pmorie this does not result in any change in any current code generation, and improves the user experience of client-gen. I ran `hack/update-codegen.sh` and saw no changes in git, nor did anything fail.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This adds a new stand-alone certificates controller for use on GKE. It
allows calling GKE to sign certificates instead of requiring the CA
private key locally.
It does not aim for 100% feature parity with kube-controller-manager
yet, so for instance, leader election support is omitted.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41667, 41820, 40910, 41645, 41361)
Switch admission to use shared informers
Originally part of #40097
cc @smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @gmarek @wojtek-t @timothysc @lavalamp @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41540, 41808, 41710, 41838, 41840)
kubeadm: update token to use '.' in discovery pkg
**What this PR does / why we need it**: While working on getting https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/381 implemented, I noticed the kubeadm discovery pkg was printing out tokens incorrectly. Corrected and fixed up corresponding test.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @jbeda
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41540, 41808, 41710, 41838, 41840)
kubeadm: Remove the --cloud-provider flag for beta init UX
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We decided the `--cloud-provider` flag promises way too much compared to what it really does. There is a lot you have to do as an user in order to make the current cloud provider integrations to work. And since we're promising to support the `kubeadm init` UX on a beta level in v1.6, we can't have this flag in the UX. A lot is gonna change here... see proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/128
Once we find a cloudprovider solution we can support (probably using the new flow), we'll just add it.
For now, we'll just document how to do cloudprovider integrations by hand instead.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
kubeadm: Remove the --cloud-provider flag for beta init UX
```
@jbeda @dmmcquay @mikedanese @roberthbailey @pires @errordeveloper
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41812, 41665, 40007, 41281, 41771)
kube-apiserver: add a bootstrap token authenticator for TLS bootstrapping
Follows up on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36101
Still needs:
* More tests.
* To be hooked up to the API server.
- Do I have to do that in a separate PR after k8s.io/apiserver is synced?
* Docs (kubernetes.io PR).
* Figure out caching strategy.
* Release notes.
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @liggitt @luxas @jbeda
```release-notes
Added a new secret type "bootstrap.kubernetes.io/token" for dynamically creating TLS bootstrapping bearer tokens.
```
