Commit Graph

689 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kubernetes Submit Queue
866aa73591 Merge pull request #36101 from jbeda/bootstrap-signer
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38252, 41122, 36101, 41017, 41264)

BootstrapSigner and TokenCleaner controllers

This is part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/130 and is an implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/189.

Work that needs to be done yet in this PR:
* [ ] ~~e2e tests~~ Will come in new PR.
* [x] flag to disable this by default

```release-note
Native support for token based bootstrap flow.  This includes signing a well known ConfigMap in the `kube-public` namespace and cleaning out expired tokens.
```

@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle @dgoodwin @roberthbailey @mikedanese
2017-02-10 15:59:40 -08:00
Derek McQuay
7c4d1375ad kubeadm: changed manifest files to yaml 2017-02-10 14:00:15 -08:00
Andrew Rynhard
052ceee47e Fix cluster-cidr flag 2017-02-10 13:52:25 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
40f147fe95 Merge pull request #41220 from errordeveloper/fix-hostname-preflight-check
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41223, 40892, 41220, 41207, 41242)

kubeadm: preflight should only warn about unresolvable hostnames

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy requirement
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.

**Special notes for your reviewer**: @dmmcquay @luxas PTAL 👍 

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-10 13:35:44 -08:00
Joe Beda
20e1f8ea9b Creates constants for bootstrap tokens.
Move these form core API to a separate package (pkg/bootstrap/api).

This also creates the constant for the new kube-public namespace.
2017-02-10 12:47:25 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
9134da4ade Merge pull request #40878 from apprenda/kubeadm_preflight_tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40796, 40878, 36033, 40838, 41210)

kubeadm: added tests for preflight checks

**What this PR does / why we need it**: There hadn't been much care to add more unit tests as more preflight checks were added. I added tests that increased coverage from ~9% to ~71%

Adding unit tests is a WIP from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/34136

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-10 00:04:46 -08:00
Ilya Dmitrichenko
829c47f94d kubeadm: preflight should only warn about unresolvable hostnames
This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy problem
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.
2017-02-10 07:35:27 +00:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
e1720af730 Merge pull request #41183 from xilabao/fix-ca-cert-in-kubeadm
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40917, 41181, 41123, 36592, 41183)

fix ca cert in kubeadm

[certificates] Valid certificates and keys now exist in "/etc/kubernetes/pki"
2017-02-09 23:10:48 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
89ca179771 Merge pull request #41123 from xilabao/replace-update-to-patch-in-setupmaster
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40917, 41181, 41123, 36592, 41183)

replace update in setupmaster.go

follow the TODO
2017-02-09 23:10:45 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
f17a5d38c2 Merge pull request #40045 from apprenda/kubeadm-112_testing
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41074, 41147, 40854, 41167, 40045)

kubeadm: adding integration tests for init

**What this PR does / why we need it**: integration tests for kubeadm init focused on valid and invalid discovery tokens

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
This was taken from Pires's work in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40008 . This is just the testing aspect of it

As it stands, these tests will never complete. The reason being is once it passes with a valid discovery token, it will wait until `[apiclient] Created API client, waiting for the control plane to become ready ` which is an infinite poll (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/cmd/kubeadm/app/master/apiclient.go#L71). 

This is a WIP
**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-09 17:41:45 -08:00
xilabao
ab72934a92 fix ca cert in kubeadm 2017-02-09 10:48:31 +08:00
Derek McQuay
63327647a5 kubeadm: added tests for preflight checks
increased coverage from ~9% to ~71%
2017-02-08 17:38:14 -08:00
xilabao
efa6afdad0 replace update to patch in setupmaster.go 2017-02-09 09:37:37 +08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
e283d21cb8 Merge pull request #40873 from liggitt/bootstrap-get-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Remove 'get node' call during bootstrapping

Kubelet bootstrapping should have minimal permissions until it obtains an approved client certificate.

@luxas PTAL

/cc @mikedanese @cjcullen https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40760#issuecomment-276832957
2017-02-08 14:14:28 -08:00
Derek McQuay
3fc181fb1b kubeadm: moved to location after SIG discussion 2017-02-08 11:31:55 -08:00
Derek McQuay
8e9f6ece8d kubeadm: adding integration tests for init
removed two tests cases that tested for success because they require
waiting for the control plan to get ready
2017-02-08 10:11:18 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
a326735ea0 Merge pull request #40175 from apprenda/kubeadm-40155-test-skip
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40175, 41107, 41111, 40893, 40919)

kubeadm: skip integration tests if kubeadm-cmd-skip flag passed

Will skip integration tests for token generation if it can't find a file by the given --kubeadm-path or default value.

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Tests would fail if just running `go test` in the dir because it expects to have more values. This won't change the behavior of `make test-cmd` which gets run here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/Makefile#L258

**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes #40155 

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @pires @pipejakob @liggitt 

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-08 01:47:37 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
3268d8102a Merge pull request #41020 from luxas/kubeadm_cleanup
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)

kubeadm: Small cleanup and fixes, validate the service subnet

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
 - Validate the minimum subnet cidr so there are always 10 available addresses
 - Remove an old proxy arg function, add clustercidr to the proxy manifest and automatically calculate the dns ip

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```

@errordeveloper @pires @mikedanese @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
2017-02-07 23:06:42 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
b58a20740a Merge pull request #40888 from apprenda/kubeadm_pkiutil_tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)

kubeadm: added tests cert/pkiutil pkg

raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%

**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to cert/pkiutil pkg and raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%

Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-07 23:06:39 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
3ce49346a7 Merge pull request #40882 from apprenda/kubeadm_util_tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41064, 41090, 41068, 41073, 40882)

kubeadm: updated tests in app/util pkg

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Tests did not follow the standard of being table driven. Updated to make future changes (Adding/deleting tests) easier as well as more readable

Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-07 13:46:41 -08:00
Derek McQuay
1459bbade4 kubeadm: updated cmd tests as discussed in SIG
After today's SIG meeting, it was discussed how to proceed with these
types of test-cmd tests.  They will live in kubeamd/test/cmd and will
provide a flag that will allow you to skip them (--kubeadm-cmd-skip) and
by default will fail if kubeadm binary is not present
2017-02-07 12:47:07 -08:00
Lucas Käldström
f6647fc152 Update bazel, the validation test and use ipallocator.RangeSize 2017-02-07 18:25:25 +02:00
Derek McQuay
d23507f40d kubeadm: added tests cert/pkiutil pkg
raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%
2017-02-07 08:22:12 -08:00
Derek McQuay
8cf23139e6 kubeadm: tests for apis/kubeadn/validation pkg 2017-02-07 09:06:12 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
751cbc9b0c Merge pull request #41026 from apprenda/kubeadm_fix_os_remove
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)

kubeadm: change os.Remove to os.RemoveAll

**What this PR does / why we need it**: This would not correctly clean out the tmp dir, since os.Remove doesn't recursively remove dirs, which could exist in the tmp dir.

Unit tests are a WIP from #34136

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-06 16:51:10 -08:00
Lucas Käldström
407722b378 Remove an old proxy arg function, add clustercidr to the proxy manifest and automatically calculate the dns ip 2017-02-06 23:09:27 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
a461eab321 Merge pull request #40883 from apprenda/kubeadm_util_template_has_unit_tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39681, 39321, 41018, 40883)

kubeadm: app/util/template.go has unit tests

**What this PR does / why we need it**: There was a TODO tag about adding unit tests, but unit tests have been added and the coverage for that file is ~90%.  Tag should be removed. 

Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-06 10:47:00 -08:00
Derek McQuay
011629fb5a kubeadm: change os.Remove to os.RemoveAll
This would not correctly clean out the tmp dir, since os.Remove doesn't
recursively remove dirs, which could exist in the tmp dir.
2017-02-06 10:28:44 -08:00
Lucas Käldström
667dc64e79 Validate the minimum subnet cidr so there are always 10 available addresses 2017-02-06 19:34:06 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
8805a068b8 Merge pull request #40937 from pipejakob/discovery
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Discovery typo fix.

Simple typo fix.

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-06 09:05:20 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
53f48f129c Merge pull request #40994 from xilabao/update-kubeadm-usage-message
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40978, 40994, 41008, 40622)

update kubeadm usage message
2017-02-06 06:45:06 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
09cb6ee193 Merge pull request #40832 from apprenda/kubeadm_discovery_remove_error_passing
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Kubeadm discovery remove error passing

**What this PR does / why we need it**: In the app/discovery there is some confusion about the passing of error values created in the discovery/token, discovery/https/ and discovery/file pkgs.  Since they always return `nil` , it was very confusing in discovery/flags.go why to propagate them up as if there was a chance for them to return a value other than `nil`.  This change makes it much more clear what is being passed.  

I noticed this as I was making a sweep through trying to add more unit tests and it was very confusing to read the code. 

**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/141

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-06 05:24:47 -08:00
xilabao
f16ed82f2f update kubeadm usage message 2017-02-06 14:25:40 +08:00
Jacob Beacham
d5319ec63d Typo fix. 2017-02-03 11:49:19 -08:00
Lucas Käldström
876153d491 Remove the kubernetes.io/cluster-service label from the Deployment templates 2017-02-02 22:08:47 +02:00
Derek McQuay
318e27b68a kubeadm: app/util/template.go has unit tests
remove TODO because unit tests have been added
2017-02-02 11:31:52 -08:00
Derek McQuay
42738fffb3 kubeadm: updated tests in app/util pkg
Tests did not follow the standard of being table driven.
2017-02-02 11:28:56 -08:00
Jordan Liggitt
2085f77e27 Remove 'get node' call during bootstrapping 2017-02-02 13:36:13 -05:00
Derek McQuay
69dd248747 kubeadm: changed error passing to be more clear
updated flag error in discovery/https, discovery/token, and
discovery/file
2017-02-02 09:18:42 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
478c82325c Merge pull request #40855 from apprenda/kubeadm_reset_better_error_logging
Automatic merge from submit-queue

kubeadm: fix reset error logging.

**What this PR does / why we need it**: while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/142 I realized error logging was misleading. This PR is meant to fix it.

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-02 08:55:41 -08:00
Paulo Pires
68113cacf2 kubeadm: fix reset error logging. 2017-02-02 12:58:42 +00:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
e47d9a6866 Merge pull request #40556 from luxas/kubeadm_proxy_rbac
Automatic merge from submit-queue

kubeadm: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases 

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

First commit: Fix the defaulting for AuthorizationMode - **Ready for review**
Second commit: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases in kubeadm - **work in progress, broken at the moment**

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

Please take a look at the first commit now. You can also see the direction I'm going with the addons and apiconfig phases.

For example, I'm using Go templates instead of creating native Go structs for kube-dns and kube-proxy now. The question is if I should do it for the RBAC rules as well, it might make sense there as well.

Converting the dns addon to a yaml spec makes it 100x easier to maintain when changes are made to the "upstream" DNS spec, and also more swappable. We could for instance have a configuration param for it for those who want a custom file, etc.

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```

@mikedanese @pires @lukemarsden @errordeveloper @dgoodwin @liggitt @andrewrynhard
2017-02-02 03:00:01 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
9dedf92d42 Merge pull request #39440 from apprenda/kubeadm_102-fix_proxy
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)

kubeadm: kube-proxy needs to know the pod subnet CIDR

**What this PR does / why we need it**: `kube-proxy` 1.5 has a new flag `cluster-cidr` that isn't specified by `kubeadm`, thus resulting in bug https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102.

**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @luxas @dmmcquay
2017-02-01 16:12:51 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
2ee058c2cc Merge pull request #40771 from apprenda/kubeadm-135-FQDN
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)

kubeadm: preflight check for incorrect FQDN

**What this PR does / why we need it**: There are a variety of system configuration errors (such as cloud-init bugs when deploying on AWS) which can cause hostname and uname -n to be wrong for a given host. This will cause kubeadm setup to fail in interesting and hard-to-figure-out ways (it doesn't fail until you start trying to set up DNS on the master, for example).

This PR adds a preflight check to test whether or not the server can reach itself using that name. This does not catch the case that the FQDN belongs to a different but valid server, but it would catch some of the cases. 

**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/135

**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas 

**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
2017-02-01 16:12:49 -08:00
Lucas Käldström
6d7d1317cb Move the apiCallRetryInterval constants to a common place and a little bit cleanup 2017-02-02 00:05:14 +02:00
Lucas Käldström
e289342158 Move the discovery deployment to a yaml spec 2017-02-01 23:55:49 +02:00
Lucas Käldström
e261627260 Remove unused helpers in apiclient.go and deploy the dummy deployment from a yaml spec 2017-02-01 23:54:31 +02:00
Lucas Käldström
183f71d57a Add a new, dedicated package for the addons and use templates instead of native Go types, and remove the previous Go files 2017-02-01 23:33:35 +02:00
Lucas Käldström
8f660dc24e Add a ParseTemplate util function for parsing go text templates easily 2017-02-01 23:33:22 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
582187b6fb Merge pull request #40758 from luxas/kubeadm_cleanup_rbac
Automatic merge from submit-queue

kubeadm: Move some code from apiclient.go to the dedicated apiconfig phase

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Add constants and somewhat refactor the RBAC code as well + some cleanup.
I'm planning to rewrite the code in `setupmaster.go` later, but this PR has only the move of the code for easier reviewing.

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

This is broken out from: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40556

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```

@mikedanese @pires @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
2017-02-01 13:20:37 -08:00