Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Replace scale down window
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Replace scale down forbidden window with scale down stabilization window.
This allows scale down based on more than one sample, to avoid rapidly changing size up and down for controllers with fluctuating load.
A bit more in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IdG3sqgCEaRV3urPLA29IDudCufD89RYCohfBPNeWIM
This PR is copy of #67771 with resolved comments.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Replace scale down forbidden window with scale down stabilization window. Rather than waiting a fixed period of time between scale downs HPA now scales down to the highest recommendation it during the scale down stabilization window.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68135, 68188). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fixup openstack cloud provider loadbalancer deletion error
This change enables ```getLoadBalancer``` to return the loadbalancer even if no floating ip is associated to the VIP port of the loadbalancer.
Signed-off-by: Eunsoo Park <esevan.park@gmail.com>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes the bug like below.
```
Warning CreatingLoadBalancerFailed 17m (x3445 over 12d) service-controller Error creating load balancer (will retry): error getting LB for service default/influxdb: error getting floating ip for port 81253cae-acd6-4bed-8006-814c8729be8c: failed to find object
```
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Refer to following bug description for better understanding of this PR.
When k8s service type is changed from LoadBalancer to others, there's a deleting loadbalancer process in kubernetes cloud provider as below.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/controller/service/service_controller.go#L284
```
if !wantsLoadBalancer(service) {
_, exists, err := s.balancer.GetLoadBalancer(context.TODO(), s.clusterName, service)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error getting LB for service %s: %v", key, err)
}
if exists {
glog.Infof("Deleting existing load balancer for service %s that no longer needs a loadbalancer.", key)
s.eventRecorder.Event(service, v1.EventTypeNormal, "DeletingLoadBalancer", "Deleting loadbalancer")
if err := s.balancer.EnsureLoadBalancerDeleted(context.TODO(), s.clusterName, service); err != nil {
return err
}
s.eventRecorder.Event(service, v1.EventTypeNormal, "DeletedLoadBalancer", "Deleted loadbalancer")
}
```
Openstack cloud provider returns error even though LB exists since there's no associated floating IP with VIP port.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/openstack/openstack_loadbalancer.go#L476
```
floatIP, err := getFloatingIPByPortID(lbaas.network, portID)
if err != nil {
return nil, false, fmt.Errorf("error getting floating ip for port %s: %v", portID, err)
}
```
This caused ```GetLoadBalancer()``` failed and retrying over and over in ```processServiceUpdate``` of ```k8sServiceController```.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add validation for kube-scheduler configuration options
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This adds validation to the kube-scheduler so that we're not accepting bogus values to the kube-scheduler. As requested by @bsalamat in issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66743
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#66743
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- Not sure if this validation is too heavy handed. Would love some feedback.
- I started working on this before I realized @islinwb was also working on this same problem... https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66787 I put this PR up anyways since I'm sure good code exists in both. I wasn't aware of the /assign command so didn't assign myself before starting work.
- I didn't have time to work on adding validation to deprecated cli options. If the rest of this looks ok, I can finish that up.
- I hope the location of IsValidSocketAddr is correct. Lmk if it isn't.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adding validation to kube-scheduler at the API level
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Affinity/Anti-Affinity Optimization of Pod Being Scheduled
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Following #66948, it was noticed that the applied optimizations for anti-affinity rules lookup of existing pods could be further applied to checking affinity and anti-affinity terms of the Pod being scheduled. This is done by mapping topology pairs to pods that potentially match the pod being scheduled instead of mapping nodes to matching pods, and accordingly the search space is reduced.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67738
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig scheduling
/sig scalability
**Release note**:
```release-note
Improve performance of Pod affinity/anti-affinity in the scheduler
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67397, 68019). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fix conversion for autoscaling/v1 ObjectMetricSource and add fuzzer
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Selectors in ObjectMetricSource's weren't being persisted through roundtrip conversions, and this wasn't caught because we had no fuzzer testing MetricIdentifier selectors
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
none
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Increase Horizontal Pod Autoscaler update frequency to every 15s
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
PR increases Horizontal Pod Autoscaler default update interval (30s -> 15s). It will improve HPA reaction time for metric changes.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Increase Horizontal Pod Autoscaler default update interval (30s -> 15s). It will improve HPA reaction time for metric changes.
```
This change enables ```getLoadBalancer``` to return the loadbalancer even if no floating ip is associated to the VIP port of the loadbalancer.
Signed-off-by: Eunsoo Park <esevan.park@gmail.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add --server-dry-run flag to `kubectl apply`
- Adds the flag
- changes the helper so that we can pass options for patch,
- Adds a test to make sure it doesn't change the object
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add new `--server-dry-run` flag to `kubectl apply` so that the request will be sent to the server with the dry-run flag (alpha), which means that changes won't be persisted.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65566, 67959, 68029, 68017, 67263). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Move kubelet ComponentConfig external types to `k8s.io/kubelet`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements most of kubernetes/community#2354 for the kubelet.
The PR:
- Moves `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/kubeletconfig` as-is to `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/config` as agreed
- Moves the external types to the new staging repo `k8s.io/kubelet`, in the `k8s.io/kubelet/config/v1beta1` package.
- Makes `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/config/v1beta1` source the types from `k8s.io/kubelet/config/v1beta1`. The defaulting and conversion code is kept in this package as before.
- All references to these packages have been updated.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref: kubernetes/community#2354
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR depends on getting https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/67780 merged first.
**Release note**:
```release-note
kubelet v1beta1 external ComponentConfig types are now available in the `k8s.io/kubelet` repo
```
/assign @sttts @mtaufen @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65566, 67959, 68029, 68017, 67263). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
add test to verify vsphere cloud provider report node hostname
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
as in pull #67922 has modify vsphere cloud provider to report
node hostname, this patch is to add the test for it.
also fix an issue at InstanceID(), it suppose to return
cloudprovider.InstanceNotFound when vm not found,
but it did double error type translation with a retry() logic,
after removing the retry() (which is not necessary), the logic is simpler, and easier to understand how double translation happened, after the fix,
test TestInstance() can pass
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** :
Fixes#67714
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
as in the process of create pull to fix https://github.com/crosscloudci/crosscloudci/issues/65#,
i saw #67922 already merged, so this pull is just to submit the test part.
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
/cc @abrarshivani @BaluDontu @divyenpatel @imkin @kerneltime @luomiao @frapposelli @dougm @liggitt
/sig cloudprovider
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add gnufied as approver for attach/detach controller
Hopefully has reviewed and made enough fixes in this
area to understand the code thoroughly.
```release-note
None
```
/assign @saad-ali @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
as hostpathtype owner, adds myself to OWNERS file
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As the owner of HostPathType, I would like to add myself to OWNERS file.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc thockin saad-ali
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Taint node in paralle.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67823
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63437, 68081). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Enable ImageLocalityPriority by default with integration tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is a follow-up to [#63842](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/63842). It moves the ImageLocalityPriority function to default priority functions of the default algorithm provider and adds integration tests for the updated scheduling policy.
- Compared to [#64662](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64662), this PR does note provide e2e test due to concerns about a large image may add too much overhead to the testing infrastructure and pipeline. We should add e2e tests in the future with the use of large enough image(s) in following PRs.
- Compared to [#64662](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64662), this PR simplifies the code changes and keeps code changes under test/integration/scheduler/.
- The PR contains a bug fix for [#65745](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65745) - caught by the integration test - where the image states are not properly cloned to the scheduler's cachedNodeInfoMap. We might split this fix into a separate PR.
The integration test covers what follows: a pod requiring a large image (~= 3GB) is submitted to the cluster and there is a single node in the cluster has the same large image; the pod should get scheduled to that node. We might also consider whether more scenarios are desired.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Kindly ping @resouer and @bsalamat
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
cloud-ctrl-mgr: enable secure port 10258
This PR enables authn+authz (delegated to the kube-apiserver) and the secure port 10258 for the cloud-controller-manager. In addition, the insecure port is disabled.
This is the counterpart PR to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64149.
Moreover, it adds integration test coverage for the `--port` and `--secure-port` flags, plus the testserver infrastructure to tests flags in general inside integration tests.
```release-note
Enable secure serving on port 10258 to cloud-controller-manager (configurable via `--secure-port`). Delegated authentication and authorization have to be configured like for aggregated API servers.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67578, 68154, 68162, 65545). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
fix usage string for the kubectl logs command
Even though the use of an inline [CONTAINER] name is still accepted for,
legacy purpose the error message does not match what the documentation
or man page says. This commit aligns the usage string that is displayed
when the `kubectl logs` command is called with more than one container
name (with the use of the -c flag or not).
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add ability to build with runtime coverage instrumentation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds the ability to instrument a subset of kubernetes binaries to report code coverage information. The specific use-case is to help determine coverage of our end-to-end Conformance tests, as well as provide data that can be used to help determine where to focus. This PR focuses on making it possible to build with instrumentation; collecting and using the generated coverage data will be done in later PRs. For more details as to the intent, see the [design doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FKMBFxz7vtA-6ZgUkA47F8m6yR00fwqLcXMVJqsHt0g/edit?usp=sharing) (google doc; requires kubernetes-dev membership).
Specifically, this PR adds a new `KUBE_BUILD_WITH_COVERAGE` make variable, which when set will cause `kube-apiserver`, `kube-controller-manager`, `kube-scheduler`, `kube-proxy` and `kubelet` to be built with coverage instrumentation. These coverage-instrumented binaries will flush coverage information to disk every five seconds, defaulting to a temporary directory unless the `KUBE_COVERAGE_FILE` environment variable is set at launch, in which case it will write to that file instead.
The mechanism used to achieve coverage instrumentation is to build the targeted binaries as "unit tests" with coverage enabled, and then rigging the unit tests to just execute the binary's usual entry point. This is implemented only for the bash build system.
/sig testing
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Reduce the minwidth of the cli table printer
For a few columns we want to have a smaller width and 10 is excessive. The example is CPU and memory for nodes.
adding validation for componentconfig
adding validation to cmd kube-scheduler
Add support for ipv6 in IsValidSocketAddr function
updating copyright date in componentconfig/validation/validation.go
updating copyright date in componentconfig/validation/validation_test.go
adding validation for cli options
adding BUILD files
updating validate function to return []errors in cmd/kube-scheduler
ok, really returning []error this time
adding comments for exported componentconfig Validation functions
silly me, not checking structs along the way :'(
refactor to avoid else statement
moving policy nil check up one function
rejigging some deprecated cmd validations
stumbling my way around validation slowly but surely
updating according to review from @bsalamat
- not validating leader election config unless leader election is enabled
- leader election time values cannot be zero
- removing validation for KubeConfigFile
- removing validation for scheduler policy
leader elect options should be non-negative
adding test cases for renewDeadline and leaseDuration being zero
fixing logic in componentconfig validation 😅
removing KubeConfigFile reference from tests as it was removed in master
2ff9bd6699
removing bogus space after var assignment
adding more tests for componentconfig based on feedback
making updates to validation because types were moved on master
update bazel build
adding validation for staging/apimachinery
adding validation for staging/apiserver
adding fieldPaths for staging validations
moving staging validations out of componentconfig
updating test case scenario for staging/apimachinery
./hack/update-bazel.sh
moving kube-scheduler validations from componentconfig
./hack/update-bazel.sh
removing non-negative check for QPS
resourceLock required
adding HardPodAffinitySymmetricWeight 0-100 range to cmd flag help section
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65251, 67255, 67224, 67297, 68105). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Cleanup PodSecurityPolicy AllowPrivEsc tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Old tests were confusing and missing a lot of combinations. The new test is a simple table-driven test with all valid combinations.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes ##67387
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Alternative to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/67388
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65251, 67255, 67224, 67297, 68105). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Promote mount propagation to GA
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR promotes mount propagation to GA.
Website PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/9823
**Release note**:
```release-note
Mount propagation has promoted to GA. The `MountPropagation` feature gate is deprecated and will be removed in 1.13.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64283, 67910, 67803, 68100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
CSI Cluster Registry and Node Info CRDs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Introduces the new `CSIDriver` and `CSINodeInfo` API Object as proposed in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2514 and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2034
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/594
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Per the discussion in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kubernetes-sig-storage-wg-csi/x5CchIP9qiI/D_TyOrn2CwAJ the API is being added to the staging directory of the `kubernetes/kubernetes` repo because the consumers will be attach/detach controller and possibly kubelet, but it will be installed as a CRD (because we want to move in the direction where the API server is Kubernetes agnostic, and all Kubernetes specific types are installed).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Introduce CSI Cluster Registration mechanism to ease CSI plugin discovery and allow CSI drivers to customize Kubernetes' interaction with them.
```
CC @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64283, 67910, 67803, 68100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add a ProcMount option to the SecurityContext & AllowedProcMountTypes to PodSecurityPolicy
So there is a bit of a chicken and egg problem here in that the CRI runtimes will need to implement this for there to be any sort of e2e testing.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR implements design proposal https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1934. This adds a ProcMount option to the SecurityContext and AllowedProcMountTypes to PodSecurityPolicy
Relies on https://github.com/google/cadvisor/pull/1967
**Release note**:
```release-note
ProcMount added to SecurityContext and AllowedProcMounts added to PodSecurityPolicy to allow paths in the container's /proc to not be masked.
```
cc @Random-Liu @mrunalp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68051, 68130, 67211, 68065, 68117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
support cross resource group for azure file
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
support cross resource group for azure file: by `resourceGroup` field, azure cloud provider will create azure file on user specified resource group
```
---
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: azurefile-rg
provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-file
parameters:
resourceGroup: RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME
storageAccount: EXISTING_STORAGE_ACCOUNT
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#64428
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
resourcegroup parameter is added to AzureFile storage class to support azure file dyanmic provision in cross resource group.
```
/kind bug
/sig azure
/assign @feiskyer
cd @khenidak
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68051, 68130, 67211, 68065, 68117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Update `kubectl get` sorter to deal with server-side printing
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
### Why?
Currently, we default to non-server-side printing when sorting items in `kubectl get`. This means that instead of taking advantage of having the server tell `kubectl` how to display information, `kubectl` falls back to using hardcoded resource types to figure out how to print its output. This does not really work with resources that `kubectl` does not know about, and it goes against our goal of snipping any dependencies that `kubectl` has on the core repo.
This patch adds a sorter capable of dealing with Table objects sent by the server when using "server-side printing".
A few things left to take care of:
- ~~[ ] When printing `all` resources, this implementation does not handle sorting every single Table object, but rather _only_ the rows in each object. As a result, output will contain sorted resources of the same _kind_, but the overall list of mixed resources will _not_ itself be sorted. Example:~~
```bash
$ kubectl get all --sort-by .metadata.name
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
# pods here will be sorted:
pod/bar 0/2 Pending 0 31m
pod/foo 1/1 Running 0 37m
NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
# replication controllers here will be sorted as well:
replicationcontroller/baz 1 1 1 37m
replicationcontroller/buz 1 1 1 37m
# ... but the overall mixed list of rc's and pods will not be sorted
```
This occurs because each Table object received from the server contains all rows for that resource _kind_. We would need a way to build an ambiguous Table object containing all rows for all objects regardless of their type to have a fully sorted mixed-object output.
- [ ] handle sorting by column-names, rather than _only_ with jsonpaths (Tracked in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/68027)
cc @soltysh @kubernetes/sig-cli-maintainers @seans3 @mengqiy
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68051, 68130, 67211, 68065, 68117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Wait for Scheduler cache empty.
Signed-off-by: Klaus Ma <klaus1982.cn@gmail.com>
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#68126
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fix how to use ipvs mode by kubeadm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
how to use ipvs mode by kubeadm
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
