Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49083, 45540, 46862)
Add extra logging to azure API get calls
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds extra logging for external calls to the Azure API, specifically get calls.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
This will help troubleshoot problems arising from the usage of this cloudprovider. For example, it looks like #43516 is caused by a call to the cloudprovider taking too much time.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49218, 48253, 48967, 48460, 49230)
additional backoff in azure cloudprovider
Fixes#48971
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We want to be able to opt in to backoff retry logic for kubelet-originating request behavior: node IP address resolution and node load balancer pool membership enforcement.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The use-case for this is azure cloudprovider clusters with large node counts, especially during cluster installation, or other scenarios when lots of nodes come online at once and attempt to register all resources with the backend API. To allow clusters at scale more control over the API request rate in-cluster, backoff config has the ability to meaningful slow down this rate, when appropriate.
**Release note**:
```additional backoff in azure cloudprovider
```
EnsureHostInPool() submits a GET to azure API for VM info. We’re seeing this on agent node kubelets and would like to enable configurable backoff engagement for 4xx responses to be able to slow down the rate of reconciliation, when appropriate.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47066, 48892, 48933, 48854, 48894)
azure: msi: add managed identity field, logic
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Enables managed service identity support for the Azure cloudprovider. "Managed Service Identity" allows us to ask the Azure Compute infra to provision an identity for the VM. Users can then retrieve the identity and assign it RBAC permissions to talk to Azure ARM APIs for the purpose of the cloudprovider needs.
Per the commit text:
```
The azure cloudprovider will now use the Managed Service Identity
to retrieve access tokens for the Azure ARM APIs, rather than
requiring hard-coded, user-specified credentials.
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: n/a
**Special notes for your reviewer**: none
**Release note**:
```release-note
azure: support retrieving access tokens via managed identity extension
```
cc: @brendandburns @jdumars @anhowe
The azure cloudprovider will now use the Managed Service Identity
to retrieve access tokens for the Azure ARM APIs, rather than
requiring hard-coded, user-specified credentials.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48594, 47042, 48801, 48641, 48243)
Add initial support for the Azure instance metadata service.
Part of fixing #46632
@colemickens @rootfs @jdumars @kris-nova
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add E2E tests for Azure internal loadbalancer support, fix an issue for public IP resource deletion.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Add E2E tests for Azure internal loadbalancer support: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43510
- Fix an issue that public IP resource not get deleted when switching from external loadbalancer to internal static loadbalancer.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
1. Add new Azure resource tag to Public IP resources to indicate kubernetes managed resources.
Currently we determine whether the public IP resource should be deleted by looking at LoadBalancerIp property on spec. In the scenario 'Switching from external loadbalancer to internal loadbalancer with static IP', that value might have been updated for internal loadbalancer. So here we're to add an explicit tag for kubernetes managed resources.
2. Merge cleanupPublicIP logic into cleanupLoadBalancer
**Release note**:
NONE
CC @brendandburns @colemickens
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Azure for cloud-controller-manager
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This implements the NodeAddressesByProviderID and InstanceTypeByProviderID methods used by the cloud-controller-manager to the Azure provider.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Addresses #47257
- leveraging Config struct (—cloud-config) to store backoff and rate limit on/off and performance configuration
- added add’l error logging
- enabled backoff for vm GET requests
- added info and error logs for appropriate backoff conditions/states
- rationalized log idioms across all resource requests that are backoff-enabled
- processRetryResponse as a wait.ConditionFunc needs to supress errors if it wants the caller to continue backing off
An initial attempt at engaging exponential backoff for API error responses.
Uses k8s.io/client-go/util/flowcontrol; implementation inspired by GCE
cloudprovider backoff.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45382, 45384, 44781, 45333, 45543)
azure: improve user agent string
**What this PR does / why we need it**: the UA string doesn't actually contain "kubernetes" in it
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: none
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc: @brendandburns
Fixes support for multiple instances of loadBalancerSourceRanges.
Previously, the names of the rules for each address range conflicted
causing only one to be applied. Now each gets a unique name.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44645, 44639, 43510)
Add support for Azure internal load balancer
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/38901
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is to add support for Azure internal load balancer
Currently when exposing a serivce with LoadBalancer type, Azure provider would assume that it requires a public load balancer.
Thus it will request a public IP address resource, and expose the service via that public IP.
In this case we're not able to apply private IP addresses (within the cluster virtual network) for the service.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
1. Clarification:
a. 'LoadBalancer' refers to an option for 'type' field under ServiceSpec. See https://kubernetes.io/docs/resources-reference/v1.5/#servicespec-v1
b. 'Azure LoadBalancer' refers a type of Azure resource. See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/load-balancer-overview
2. For a single Azure LoadBalancer, all frontend ip should reference either a subnet or publicIpAddress, which means that it could be either an Internet facing load balancer or an internal one.
For current provider, it would create an Azure LoadBalancer with generated '${loadBalancerName}' for all services with 'LoadBalancer' type.
This PR introduces name '${loadBalancerName}-internal' for a separate Azure Load Balancer resource, used by all the service that requires internal load balancers.
3. This PR introduces a new annotation for the internal load balancer type behaviour:
a. When the annotaion value is set to 'false' or not set, it falls back to the original behaviour, assuming that user is requesting a public load balancer;
b. When the annotaion value is set to 'true', the following rule applies depending on 'loadBalancerIP' field on ServiceSpec:
- If 'loadBalancerIP' is not set, it will create a load balancer rule with dynamic assigned frontend IP under the cluster subnet;
- If 'loadBalancerIP' is set, it will create a load balancer rule with the frontend IP set to the given value. If the given value is not valid, that is, it does not falls into the cluster subnet range, then the creation will fail.
4. Users may change the load balancer type by applying the annotation to the service at runtime.
In this case, the load balancer rule would need to be 'switched' between the internal one and external one.
For example, it we have a service with internal load balancer, and then user removes the annotation, making it to a public one. Before we creating rules in the public Azure LoadBalancer, we'll need to clean up rules in the internal Azure LoadBalancer.
**Release note**:
