Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove cast utilities from rbac
Casting functions like these are a source of pain in OpenShift. We should eliminate them to avoid drift problems like we've had downstream.
@kubernetes/sig-auth
@ericchiang ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
rbac validation: rules can't combine non-resource URLs and regular resources
This PR updates the validation used for RBAC to prevent rules from mixing non-resource URLs and regular resources.
For example the following is no longer valid
```yml
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1alpha1
metadata:
name: admins
rules:
- apiGroups: ["*"]
resources: ["*"]
verbs: ["*"]
nonResourceURLs: ["*"]
```
And must be rewritten as so.
```yml
kind: ClusterRole
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1alpha1
metadata:
name: admins
rules:
- apiGroups: ["*"]
resources: ["*"]
verbs: ["*"]
- nonResourceURLs: ["*"]
verbs: ["*"]
```
It also:
* Mandates non-zero length arrays for required resources.
* Mandates non-resource URLs only be used for ClusterRoles (not namespaced Roles).
* Updates the swagger validation so `verbs` are the only required field in a rule. Further validation is done by the server.
Also, do we need to bump the API version?
Discussed by @erictune and @liggitt in #28304
Updates kubernetes/features#2
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth
Edit:
* Need to update the RBAC docs if this change goes in.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix RBAC authorizer of ServiceAccount
RBAC authorizer assigns a role to a wrong service account.
How to reproduce
1.Create role and rolebinding to allow default user in kube-system namespace to read secrets in kube-system namespace.
```
# kubectl create -f role.yaml
# kubectl create -f binding.yaml
```
```yaml
# role.yaml
kind: Role
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1alpha1
metadata:
name: secret-reader
namespace: kube-system
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
resources: ["secrets"]
verbs: ["get", "watch", "list"]
nonResourceURLs: []
```
```yaml
# binding.yaml
kind: RoleBinding
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1alpha1
metadata:
name: read-secrets
namespace: kube-system
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: default
namespace: kube-system
roleRef:
kind: Role
namespace: kube-system
name: secret-reader
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1alpha1
```
2.Set a credential of default user
```
$ kubectl config set-credentials default_user --token=<token_of_system:serviceaccount:kube-system:default>
$ kubectl config set-context default_user-context --cluster=test-cluster --user=default_user
$ kubectl config use-context default_user-context
```
3.Try to get secrets as default user in kube-system namespace
```
$ kubectl --namespace=kube-system get secrets
the server does not allow access to the requested resource (get secrets)
```
As shown above, default user could not access to secrets.
But if I have kube-system user in default namespace, it is allowed access to secrets.
4.Create a service account and try to get secrets as kube-system user in default namespace
```
# kubectl --namespace=default create serviceaccount kube-system
serviceaccount "kube-system" created
$ kubectl config set-credentials kube-system_user --token=<token_of_system:serviceaccount:default:kube-system>
$ kubectl config set-context kube-system_user-context --cluster=test-cluster --user=kube-system_user
$ kubectl config use-context kube-system_user-context
$ kubectl --namespace=kube-system get secrets
NAME TYPE DATA AGE
default-token-8pyb3 kubernetes.io/service-account-token 3 4d
```
