add initial work for mount azure file on windows
fix review comments
full implementation for attach azure file on windows node
working azure file mount
remove useless functions
add a workable implementation about mounting azure file on windows node
fix review comments and make the pod creating successful even azure file mount failed
fix according to review comments
add mount_windows_test
add implementation for IsLikelyNotMountPoint func
remove mount_windows_test.go temporaly
add back unit test for mount_windows.go
add normalizeWindowsPath func
fix normalizeWindowsPath func issue
implment azure disk on windows
update bazel BUILD
revert validation.go change as it's another PR
fix merge issue and compiling issue
fix windows compiling issue
fix according to review comments
fix according to review comments
fix cross-build failure
fix according to review comments
fix test build failure temporalily
fix darwin build failure
fix azure windows test failure
add empty implementation of MakeRShared on windows
fix gofmt errors
This change is prerequisite for implementing iSCSI attacher
and detacher.
In order to use chap authentication at iSCSI plugin after
implementing attacher and detacher, secret is needed at
AttachDisk() which is called from WaitForAttach().
To obtain secret, pod information is required, but
WaitForAttach() doesn't pass pod information inside.
This patch adds 'pod' as an argument of WaitForAttach()
and adds changes to drivers who implements WaitForAttach().
Fixes#48953
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove repeated reviewer's names
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45345, 49470, 49407, 49448, 49486)
Support "fstype" parameter in dynamically provisioned PVs
This PR is a replacement for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40805. I was not able to push fixes and rebases to the original branch as I don't have access to the Github organization anymore.
I assume the PR will need a new "ok to test"
**ORIGINAL PR DESCRIPTION**
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR allows specifying the desired FSType when dynamically provisioning volumes with storage classes. The FSType can now be set as a parameter:
```yaml
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
metadata:
name: test
provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-disk
parameters:
fstype: xfs
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#37801
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The PR also implicitly adds checks for unsupported parameters.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Support specifying of FSType in StorageClass
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove some people from OWNERS so they don't get reviews anymore
These are googlers who don't work on the project anymore but are still
getting reviews assigned to them:
- @bprashanth
- @rjnagal
- @vmarmol
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45283, 45289, 45248, 44295)
Azure disk: dealing with missing disk probe
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
While Azure disks are expected to attach to SCSI host 3 and above on general purpose instances, on certain Azure instances disks are under SCSI host 2.
This fix searches all LUNs but excludes those used by Azure sys disks, based on udev rules [here](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/master/config/66-azure-storage.rules)
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
azure disk: add logging on disk attach
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
While we were debugging a failed azure disk attach, we were missing logging information to identify the root cause. This fix logs information at each stage of attach to help identify where problem is once it happens again.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
NONE
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39826, 40030)
azure disk: restrict length of name
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes dynamic disk provisioning on Azure by properly truncating the disk name to conform to the Azure API spec.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
n/a
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
n/a
**Release note**:
```release-note
azure disk: restrict name length for Azure specifications
```
cc: @rootfs
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
