Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use `CreatedByAnnotation` constant
A nit but didn't want the strings to get out of sync.
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Refactor] Make QoS naming consistent across the codebase
@derekwaynecarr @vishh PTAL. Can one of you please attach a LGTM.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubectl describe node is allocatable aware
`kubectl describe node` will render node.status.allocatable if present.
in addition, it will report allocated resources relative to node.status.allocatable if present instead of capacity.
old code was confusing if you setup system-reserved and kube-reserved as allocated resource percentages were relative to node capacity and not schedulable amount of resources.
this is a small but valuable usability improvement, so i think it would be good to make 1.3 milestone.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @kubernetes/kubectl @davidopp
Fixes#21526
Also test wide outputs. We only guarantee the first IP to be fully printed
if multiple ingresses are present. For AWS, which has no ingress IPs, but
only hostnames, the ELB hostname will be truncated, unless -o=wide is
specified.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Stabilize map order in kubectl describe
Refs #25251.
Add `SortedResourceNames()` methods to map type aliases in order to achieve stable output order for `kubectl` descriptors.
This affects QoS classes, resource limits, and resource requests.
A few remarks:
1. I couldn't find map usages for described fields other than the ones mentioned above. Then again, I failed to identify those programmatically/systematically. Pointers given, I'd be happy to cover any gaps within this PR or along additional ones.
1. It's somewhat difficult to deterministically test a function that brings reliable ordering to Go maps due to its randomizing nature. None of the possibilities I came up with (rely a "probabilistic testing" against repeatedly created maps, add complexity through additional interfaces) seemed very appealing to me, so I went with testing my `sort.Interface` implementation and the changed logic in `kubectl.describeContainers()`.
1. It's apparently not possible to implement a single function that sorts any map's keys generically in Go without producing lots of boilerplate: a `map[<key type>]interface{}` is different from any other map type and thus requires explicit iteration on the caller site to convert back and forth. Unfortunately, this makes it hard to completely avoid code/test duplication.
Please let me know what you think.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor persistent volume controller
Here is complete persistent controller as designed in https://github.com/pmorie/pv-haxxz/blob/master/controller.go
It's feature complete and compatible with current binder/recycler/provisioner. No new features, it *should* be much more stable and predictable.
Testing
--
The unit test framework is quite complicated, still it was necessary to reach reasonable coverage (78% in `persistentvolume_controller.go`). The untested part are error cases, which are quite hard to test in reasonable way - sure, I can inject a VersionConflictError on any object update and check the error bubbles up to appropriate places, but the real test would be to run `syncClaim`/`syncVolume` again and check it recovers appropriately from the error in the next periodic sync. That's the hard part.
Organization
---
The PR starts with `rm -rf kubernetes/pkg/controller/persistentvolume`. I find it easier to read when I see only the new controller without old pieces scattered around.
[`types.go` from the old controller is reused to speed up matching a bit, the code looks solid and has 95% unit test coverage].
I tried to split the PR into smaller patches, let me know what you think.
~~TODO~~
--
* ~~Missing: provisioning, recycling~~.
* ~~Fix integration tests~~
* ~~Fix e2e tests~~
@kubernetes/sig-storage
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24331)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#15632
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Automatically add node labels beta.kubernetes.io/{os,arch}
Proposal: #17981
As discussed in #22623:
> @davidopp: #9044 says cloud provider but can also cover platform stuff.
Adds a label `beta.kubernetes.io/platform` to `kubelet` that informs about the os/arch it's running on.
Makes it easy to specify `nodeSelectors` for different arches in multi-arch clusters.
```console
$ kubectl get no --show-labels
NAME STATUS AGE LABELS
127.0.0.1 Ready 1m beta.kubernetes.io/platform=linux-amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=127.0.0.1
$ kubectl describe no
Name: 127.0.0.1
Labels: beta.kubernetes.io/platform=linux-amd64,kubernetes.io/hostname=127.0.0.1
CreationTimestamp: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:39:15 +0300
```
@davidopp @vishh @fgrzadkowski @thockin @wojtek-t @ixdy @bgrant0607 @dchen1107 @preillyme
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Introduce events flag for describers
Printing events for a given object is not always needed. Thus, introducing --show-events=false to ``kubectl describe`` to skip events printing.
Fixes: #24239
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubectl describe: show multiple labels/annotations on multiple lines
Small UX improvement: when there is more than one label/annotation, it's more readable to see them on the different lines.
Before:
```console
$ kubectl describe svc
Name: s2i-test
Namespace: test2
Labels: app=s2i-test,foo=bar
...
```
After:
```console
$ kubectl describe svc
Name: s2i-test
Namespace: test2
Labels: app=s2i-test
foo=bar
...
```
This change affects output of the labels/annotations in many of the sub-commands of the `kubectl describe`.
PTAL @smarterclayton @kargakis
Introduce DescriberSettings for Describer display options
Introduce --show-events flag and DescriberSettings in Describer methods
Introduce unit-tests
Regenerated kubectl describe docs
Add events flag tests to test-cmd.sh
Signed-off-by: dhodovsk@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: jchaloup@redhat.com
