Lots of comments describing the heuristics, how it fits together and the
limitations.
In particular, we can't guarantee correct volume placement if the set of
zones is changing between allocating volumes.
Long term we plan on integrating this into the scheduler, but in the
short term we use the volume name to place it onto a zone.
We hash the volume name so we don't bias to the first few zones.
If the volume name "looks like" a PetSet volume name (ending with
-<number>) then we use the number as an offset. In that case we hash
the base name.
Fixes#27256
Recycling is a long duration process and when the recycler controller is
restarted in the meantime, it should not start a new recycler pod if there is
one already running.
This means that the recycler pod must have deterministic name based on name
of the recycled PV, we then get name conflicts when creating the pod.
Two things need to be changed:
- recycler controller and recycler plugins must pass the PV.Name to place,
where the pod is created.
- create recycler pod with deterministic name and check "already exists" error.
When at it, remove useless 'resourceVersion' argument and make log messages
starting with lowercase.
Volume names have now format <cluster-name>-dynamic-<pv-name>.
pv-name is guaranteed to be unique in Kubernetes cluster, adding
<cluster-name> ensures we don't conflict with any running cluster
in the cloud project (kube-controller-manager --cluster-name=XXX).
'kubernetes' is the default cluster name.
