If not, using `go test -count=n` would make them pile up and ultimately
get to the limit of open files:
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:39768: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 5ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 5ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 10ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 20ms
Steps to reproduce (no longer fails):
godep go test -short -run '^$' -o test .
./test -test.run '^TestDoRequestNewWayFile$' -test.count 100
Note that this might not fail if your `ulimit -n` is not low enough.
There has been a recent regression causing kubelet to assume no containers are
running for the pod if kubelet has not seen the pod before. This would cause
all containers to be restarted after kubelet gets restarted. This change fixes
the bug.
Implement a flag that defines the frequency at which a node's out of
disk condition can change its status. Use this flag to suspend out of
disk status changes in the time period specified by the flag, after
the status is changed once.
Set the flag to 0 in e2e tests so that we can predictably test out of
disk node condition.
Also, use util.Clock interface for all time related functionality in
the kubelet. Calling time functions in unversioned package or time
package such as unversioned.Now() or time.Now() makes it really hard
to test such code. It also makes the tests flaky and sometimes
unnecessarily slow due to time.Sleep() calls used to simulate the
time elapsed. So use util.Clock interface instead which can be faked
in the tests.
We add claim.Name and claim.Namespace as tags to AWS EBS / GCE PD / OpenStack
Cinder volumes created by Kubernetes. To easily match Kubernetes volumes and
cloud volumes, let's add also PV.Name.
If a route already exists but is invalid (e.g. from a crash), we
automatically delete it before trying to create a route that would
otherwise conflict.
