Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix too extensive logging in Stackdriver Logging e2e tests
Since logging pod now includes a cache, printing it out makes build-log unusable.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48377, 48940, 49144, 49062, 49148)
Add cos-dev-61-9733-0-0 to the benchmark tests
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
m60 has docker 1.13.1 while m61 has 17.03. This PR adds m61 to the benchmark tests so that we will have more data to compare.
PS: We will support fetching the latest image in an image family in the node e2e tests in the future.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
/cc @kewu1992 @abgworrall
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48377, 48940, 49144, 49062, 49148)
fixit: break sig-cluster-lifecycle tests into subpackage
this is part of fixit week. ref #49161
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add PriorityClass API object under new "scheduling" API group
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR is a part of a series of PRs to add pod priority to Kubernetes. This PR adds a new API group called "scheduling" with a new API object called "PriorityClass". PriorityClass maps the string value of priority to its integer value.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: Given the size of this PR, I will add the admission controller for the PriorityClass in a separate PR.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add PriorityClass API object under new "scheduling" API group
```
ref/ #47604
ref/ #48646
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47509, 46821, 45319, 49121, 49125)
Tolerate a missing MasterName (for GKE)
When testing, GKE created clusters don't provide a `MasterName`, so don't throw a warning and give up when that happens.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47509, 46821, 45319, 49121, 49125)
volume i/o tests for storage plugins
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Addresses issues [25268](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/25268) and [28367](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/28367), though it may be weak re. the streaming i/o issue. @matchstick
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a new file. Plugins other than NFS, GlusterFS, iSCSI, and Ceph-RBD code will need to be supported in a separate PR.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Bump e2e mounttest image version to 0.8
Reduce the number of image files required for e2e test run
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49143, 49211)
Add more logging to PD node delete test
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adds more logging to `Pod Disks should be able to detach from a node which was deleted` test which started failing because `gcloud compute instances list` is failing with `exit status 1`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49185
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: none
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49058, 49072, 49137, 49182, 49045)
*: remove --insecure-allow-any-token option
~Since the authenticator is still used in e2e tests, don't remove
the actual package. Maybe a follow up?~
edit: e2e and integration tests have been switched over to the tokenfile
authenticator instead.
```release-note
The --insecure-allow-any-token flag has been removed from kube-apiserver. Users of the flag should use impersonation headers instead for debugging.
```
closes#49031
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49116, 49095)
Move pkg/api/v1/ref -> client-go/tools/reference
`pkg/api/v1/ref` is the only remaining package copied from pkg/api/v1 to client-go via staging/copy.sh.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48043, 48200, 49139, 36238, 49130)
Implement equivalence cache by caching and re-using predicate result
The last part of #30844, I opened a new PR instead of overwrite the old one because we changed some basic assumption by allowing invalidating equivalence cache item by individual predicate.
The idea of this PR is based on discussion in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32024
- [x] Pods belong to same controllerRef considered to be equivalent
- [x] ` podFitsOnNode` will use cached predicate result if it's available
- [x] Equivalence cache will be updated when if a fresh new predicate is done
- [x] `factory.go` will invalid specific predicate cache(s) based on the object change
- [x] Since `schedule` and `bind` are async, we need to optimistically invalid affected cache(s) before `bind`
- [x] Fully unit test of affected files
- [x] e2e test to verify cache update/invalid workflow
- [x] performance test results
- [x] Some nits fixes related but expected to result in `needs-rebase` so they are split to: #36060#35968#37512
cc @wojtek-t @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49055, 49128, 49132, 49134, 49110)
Remove affinity annotations leftover
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a further cleanup for affinity annotations, following #47869.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
ref: #47869
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- I remove the commented test cases and just leave TODOs instead. I think converting these untestable test cases for now is not necessary. We can add new test cases in future.
- I remove the e2e test case `validates that embedding the JSON PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity setting as a string in the annotation value work` because we have a test case `validates that InterPod Affinity and AntiAffinity is respected if matching` to test the same thing.
/cc @aveshagarwal @bsalamat @gyliu513 @k82cn @timothysc
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48914, 48535, 49099, 48935, 48871)
Adopt debian-base as baseimage
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Based on discussion from - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/44910/files#r125150263
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49169
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48481, 48256)
Refactor: pkg/util into sub-pkgs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- move code in pkg/util into sub-pkgs
- delete some unused funcs
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#15634
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is the final work of #15634. It will close that issue.
/cc @thockin
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Add PriorityClass to pkg/registry
Add PriorityClass to pkg/master/master.go
Add PriorityClass to import_know_versions.go
Update linted packages
minor fix
e2e and integration tests have been switched over to the tokenfile
authenticator instead.
```release-note
The --insecure-allow-any-token flag has been removed from kube-apiserver. Users of the flag should use impersonation headers instead for debugging.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46094, 48544, 48807, 49102, 44174)
Shared Informer Run blocks until all goroutines finish
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Makes Shared Informer Run method block until all goroutines it spawned finish. See #45454.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Fixes#45454
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49019, 48919, 49040, 49018, 48874)
correcting spell mistake
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Correcting spell mistake.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
NONE
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Sanitize test names before using them as namespaces
**What this PR does / why we need it**: It sanitizes upgrade test names before creating namespaces.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48876
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48231, 47377, 48797, 49020, 49033)
Update yaml and json with multi arch test images
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is for updating the yaml and json files under test/images folder with multi arch images
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48494, 48733)
Move test-webserver from contrib/for-demos to kubernetes/test/images
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is for
- Moving the https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/tree/master/for-demos/test-webserver to kubernetes/test/images - Refer https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/pull/2544 for more information
- Multi architecture support for test-webserver image
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48991, 48908)
Group every two services into one in load test
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48938
Following from discussion with @bowei and @freehan .
This reduces #services to 8200 while keeping no. of backends same.
/cc @wojtek-t @gmarek
