* fix: 81134: fix unsafe json for ReleaseControllerRevision
1. Ensures that ReleaseControllerRevision returns a proper json by
marshalling an object into bytes. Otherwise, it returns an error.
2. Also, refactors the code to commonize the merge type
GenerateDeleteOwnerRefStrategicMergeBytes that returns a byte and is
used across ReleasePod, ReleaseControllerRevison
ReleaseReplicaSet.
* Move GeneratePatchBytesForDelete to controller_ref_manager
Filter the allEndpoints list into readyEndpoints sooner, and set
"hasEndpoints" based (mostly) on readyEndpoints, not allEndpoints (so
that, eg, we correctly generate REJECT rules for services with no
_functioning_ endpoints, even if they have unusable terminating
endpoints).
Also, write out the endpoint chains at the top of the loop when we
iterate the endpoints for the first time, rather than copying some of
the data to another set of variables and then writing them out later.
And don't write out endpoint chains that won't be used
Also, generate affinity rules only for readyEndpoints rather than
allEndpoints, so affinity gets broken correctly when an endpoint
becomes unready.
The external traffic policy terminating endpoints test was testing
LoadBalancer functionality against a NodePort service with no
nodePorts (or loadBalancer IPs). It managed to test what it wanted to
test, but it's kind of dubious (and we probably _shouldn't_ have been
generating the rules it was looking for since there was no way to
actually reach the XLB chains). So fix that.
Also make the terminating endpoints test use session affinity, to add
more testing for that. Also, remove the multiple copies of the same
identical Service that is used for all of the test cases in that test.
Also add a "Cluster traffic policy and no source ranges" test to
TestOverallIPTablesRulesWithMultipleServices since we weren't really
testing either of those.
Also add a test of --masquerade-all.
The test got broken to not actually use "no cluster CIDR" when
LocalDetector was implemented (and the old version of the unit test
didn't check enough to actually notice this).
The original tests here were very shy about looking at the iptables
output, and just relied on checks like "make sure there's a jump to
table X that also includes string Y somewhere in it" and stuff like
that. Whereas the newer tests were just like, "eh, here's a wall of
text, make sure the iptables output is exactly that". Although the
latter looks messier in the code, it's more precise, and it's easier
to update correctly when you change the rules. So just make all of the
tests do a check on the full iptables output.
(Note that I didn't double-check any of the output; I'm just assuming
that the output of the current iptables proxy code is actually
correct...)
Also, don't hardcode the expected number of rules in the metrics
tests, so that there's one less thing to adjust when rules change.
Also, use t.Run() in one place to get more precise errors on failure.
The test was sorting the iptables output so as to not depend on the
order that services get processed in, but this meant it wasn't
checking the relative ordering of rules (and in fact, the ordering of
the rules in the "expected" string was wrong, in a way that would
break things if the rules had actually been generated in that order).
Add a more complicated sorting function that sorts services
alphabetically while preserving the ordering of rules within each
service.
These three options are the ones from logs.AddFlags which are not deprecated.
Therefore it makes sense to make them available also via the configuration file
support in the one command which currently supports that (kubelet).
Long-term, all commands should use LoggingConfiguration, either with a
configuration file (as in kubelet) or via flags (kube-scheduler,
kube-apiserver, kube-controller-manager).
Short-term, both approaches have to be supported. As the majority of the
commands only use logs.AddFlags, that function by default continues to register
the flags and only leaves that to Options.AddFlags when explicitly requested.
A drive-by bug fix is done for log flushing: the periodic flushing called
klog.Flush and therefore missed explicit flushing of the newer logr
backend. This bug was never present in any release Kubernetes and therefore the
fix is not submitted in a separate PR.
This feature has graduated to GA in v1.11 and will always be
enabled. So no longe need to check if enabled.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Misyutin <konstantin.misyutin@huawei.com>
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
