Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67332, 66737, 67281, 67173). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
storage e2e test: remove race when setting up loopback device
CI has shown occasional failures stemming from an -EBUSY when
test/e2e/storage/persistent_volumes-local.go aka "PersistentVolumes-local"
attempts to do losetup.
Looking at the code, it has a clear race between querying the current
free loopback device and later explicitly attempting to loopback setup a
file at the queried device node. Losetup nowadays includes the logic to
handle this for the user, if the '-f' option is used instead of naming
the desired target loopback device explicitly. It is safe to presume
a suitable losetup is present as the '-f' option is used elsewhere in
the test, and it is safe to not record the allocated device, as it is
already queried on the fly elsewhere in the test ahead of other commands
which need to know an already created loopback device's node name.
This patch should result in less flakes for this test case.
Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <tpepper@vmware.com>
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Error in return value should be tested and fix Description Info in e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Error in return value should be tested
2. fix Description Info
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67596, 67520, 67605). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Wait for Available in PV protection test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Just after creating a PV, its phase is "Pending" and its finalizers
doesn't contain "kubernetes.io/pv-protection". If the e2e test performs
so faster than the target k8s cluster, the test fails because the PV is
not ready. This adds WaitForPersistentVolumePhase() for waiting the
phase "Available" to avoid such situation.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67519
**Release note**: NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67194, 67540). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix framework.WaitForDaemonSets
* when daemonsets are not ready, wait for really them
* swap parameters in Logf so that they are more readable.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67062, 67169, 67539, 67504, 66876). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Allow requesting specific gpu in autoscaling e2e tests
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66920, 67316, 67363, 67528, 66963). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
some minor fix in test/e2e/kubectl/kubectl.go and remove some unused functions
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
some minor fix in test/e2e/kubectl/kubectl.go
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
should not fmt.printf in the e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
should not fmt.printf in the e2e test
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Just after creating a PV, its phase is "Pending" and its finalizers
doesn't contain "kubernetes.io/pv-protection". If the e2e test performs
so faster than the target k8s cluster, the test fails because the PV is
not ready. This adds WaitForPersistentVolumePhase() for waiting the
phase "Available" to avoid such situation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67100, 67426). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
porting e2e_node lifecycle testcases into e2e folder under common
a) Shifted (and renamed) file existing in e2e_node to e2e/common.
b) Added these tests to the conformance suite:
- "should execute poststart exec hook properly"
- "should execute prestop exec hook properly"
- "should execute poststart http hook properly"
- "should execute prestop http hook properly"
[reference issue](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/67086) explaining the effort.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67461, 67464, 67416). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP in test/e2e/network/
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP in test/e2e/network/
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66884, 67410, 67229, 67409). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
modify a duplicate e2e test of DNS configMap
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
modify a duplicate e2e test of DNS configMap. It is duplicate with the case in d655c9a873/test/e2e/network/dns_configmap.go (L345)
I think it should run dnsFederationsConfigMapTest in original purpose.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67347, 67307, 67358, 67364, 67385). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
delete the busyboxImage and mountTest var and change use imageutils
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
delete the ```busyboxImage```,```mountTest``` variable and change everything to use ```imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.BusyBox)```, ```imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.MountTest)```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67237
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mikedanese
/assign @mikedanese
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67294, 67320, 67335, 67334, 67325). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix some minor mistakes in e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix some minor mistakes in e2e
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67294, 67320, 67335, 67334, 67325). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use framework.GetClusterZones() instead of getZoneNames()
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix todo:
use framework.GetClusterZones() instead of getZoneNames()
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
#50102 Task 1: Move apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until into client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a split off from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50102 to go in smaller pieces.
Moves `apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` into `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry` and adds context so it is cancelable.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
**Dev release note**:
```dev-release-note
`apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` has been moved to `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry`.
While switching please consider using the new `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithSync` or `client-go/tools/watch.Until`.
```
/cc @smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/milestone v1.12
/priority important-soon
/kind bug
(bug after the main PR which is this split from)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting "[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace" to Conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
An consolidated effort to resolve the issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66875
> _[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace_
Promoting mentioned e2e test for Conformance as it -
- Validates that secret with same name can be created in different namespaces but secrets which reside in same namespace as that of pod can be only be accessed from volume mounted in the container.
- Improves api coverage including prioritized Pod API lists. https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes Found.
```
• [SLOW TEST:16.326 seconds]
[sig-storage] Secrets
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:33
should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance]
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:86
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Aug 7 07:12:44.133: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Aug 7 07:12:44.134: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 1020 Specs in 16.441 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 1019 Skipped PASS
All tests passed...
Will keep running them until they fail.
This was attempt #40
No, seriously... you can probably stop now.
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61212, 66369, 66446, 66895, 66969). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting configmap binarydata support [NodeConformance] test to conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**e2e:** _[sig-storage] ConfigMap binary data should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance]_
Promotes mentioned e2e to conformance as it -
1. Validates ConfigMap's binarydata support effectively
2. Improves API Coverage for prioritized api lists. (https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061)
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes found.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Currently, the PVC protection controller will remove its finalizer when
all Pods using a PVC reach at least a Terminating state. However,
certain volumes cannot be guaranteed to be umounted until a Pod is
deleted. Only Pods not in the current pods list can be considered
deleted, so we're removing the exception to not check Terminating Pods.
Signed-off-by: Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa@redhat.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Correct spelling errors in the comments
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
End2End tests for DynamicVolumeProvisioning of EBS
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add end2end tests to exercise `DynamicProvisioningScheduling` features for EBS. The tests make sure `WaitForFirstConsumer` and `AllowedTopologies` specified in a EBS storage class has the desired effect.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Tests features added to 217a3d8902
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66984, 67236, 67216, 62721, 67106). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Allow running various storage e2e tests on custom images
Ubuntu image is treated as custom image in some e2e tests. We whitelist both ubuntu and custom to run the storage tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
/assign @msau42
/release-note-none
/sig storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove ARCH specific image consideration from e2e tests
Change-Id: I309fec49b030a4d457890f25d2f69e7c641c03fd
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
All e2e test images are now using multi-arch manifests so we should stop
looking up and using images that are specific to runtime.GOARCH
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
CI has shown occasional failures stemming from an -EBUSY when
test/e2e/storage/persistent_volumes-local.go aka "PersistentVolumes-local"
attempts to do losetup.
Looking at the code, it has a clear race between querying the current
free loopback device and later explicitly attempting to loopback setup a
file at the queried device node. Losetup nowadays includes the logic to
handle this for the user, if the '-f' option is used instead of naming
the desired target loopback device explicitly. It is safe to presume
a suitable losetup is present as the '-f' option is used elsewhere in
the test, and it is safe to not record the allocated device, as it is
already queried on the fly elsewhere in the test ahead of other commands
which need to know an already created loopback device's node name.
This patch should result in less flakes for this test case.
Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <tpepper@vmware.com>
