Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Centralize commonly used paths/constants to the constants pkg
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Before there were constants defined for the control plane components in three different places:
- images
- phases/controlplane
- phases/selfhosting
Now they are in one centralized place. I also moved funcs for building common paths to that lib.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Dependency for: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48899
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Most of this PR really is autogenerated with a replace tool. I tested this and things work just normally as well.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@timothysc @dmmcquay @pipejakob @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50254, 50174, 50179)
kubeadm: Add back labels for the Static Pod control plane
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This Labels section has been removed now for a short period during the v1.8 dev cycle, but I found a good use-case for it; namely filtering Mirror Pods by the `component=kube-*` label when waiting for the self-hosted control plane to come up after an upgrade. It's not _really_ neccessary, but nice to have.
Also noticed the lack of coverage for this func, so added a small unit test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Dependency for: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48899
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @dmmcquay @timothysc @mattmoyer
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46210, 48607, 46874, 46598, 49240)
kubeadm: Make the hostPath volume mount code more secure
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Refactors the hostpath volume mounting code for the Static Pods
- Splits out the functionality that was in a big function to something testable
- Unit test a lot
- Adds support for mounting external etcd CA/cert/key files in an other path than `/etc/ssl/certs`. Before this you **had** to have your files in there or the apiserver would crashloop
- Significantly improves comment coverage
- Now only mounts the bare essentials instead of nearly everything. For example, don't mount full `/etc/kubernetes` when the only thing you need is `/etc/kubernetes/scheduler.conf`
- Make everything but the etcd datadir read-only for components.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/341
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48333, 48806, 49046)
kubeadm: Split out markmaster to its own phase
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splits out related and atomic code into its own phase that can be invokable easily from the CLI.
Makes the code much easier to read by not using recursion and `wait.InfinitePoll` _inside_ of a recursing function, etc.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/53
Part of this more long-term goal: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/148
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49019, 48919, 49040, 49018, 48874)
kubeadm: Remove the old KubernetesDir envparam
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The last piece of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48053 for moving the env params into the API, and the KubernetesDir into a constant.
After this pretty mechanical change, we might offer short-hand functions in constants like `GetStaticPodManifestDir()` etc easily in order to centralize the `filepath.Join` logic into one place.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/326
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @fabriziopandini
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Remove some old comments
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes old and outdated comments.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@dmmcquay
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48781, 48817, 48830, 48829, 48053)
kubeadm: Start to remove old envparams
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Historically, the envparams feature was used as a way to easily debug `kubeadm` while developing it in the v1.3-v1.4 timeframe. Since then some parameters have been hanging around and not being moved into the API as they should have.
Note: This is a temporary step; moving things into the API. Still, the API is gonna change, this is not the end state. But this is better than keeping the envparams.
I'm gonna deal with `KubernetesDir` in the next PR.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: kubernetes/kubeadm#326
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@timothysc @pipejakob
Allow to specify a node-name instead of relaying in `os.Hostname()`
This is useful where kubelet use the name given by the cloud-provider to
register the node.
Partially fix: kubernetes/kubeadm#64
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Start using Tolerations in yaml code again and unit-test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Earlier there was a problem with decoding Tolerations from yaml. Seems to be fixed now.
- Added an unit test to catch such a failure if that regression ever happens again
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Targets v1.8
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @timothysc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Expose only the cluster-info ConfigMap in the kube-public ns
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Noticed a bug; we should only expose the `cluster-info` ConfigMap.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/320
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Cherrypick-candidate for v1.8 cc @dchen1107
Not blocking the release though...
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@jbeda @pipejakob @timothysc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Make kube-proxy RollingUpgradeable
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Sets the right updateStrategy for kube-proxy.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/319
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@pipejakob @timothysc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Remove the validate phase as it's not needed
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This validation code was added in v1.4 as a way to remove flakiness between deploying the control plane in Static Pods and deploying kube-discovery as a Deployment.
That isn't the case anymore and we're not experiencing such flakiness, as we're using other methods like checking `/healthz` to determine a healthy control plane before proceeding.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43881 removed this logic from `kubeadm init` to having it as a phase. But that phase isn't needed or used in any way, so now I'm removing it here.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Targets v1.8
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @timothysc @mikedanese
