Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove all MAINTAINER statements in the codebase as they are deprecated
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ref: https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/25466
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove all MAINTAINER statements in Dockerfiles in the codebase as they are deprecated by docker
```
@ixdy @thockin (who else should be notified?)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adds assignees for kube-dns
Adds assignees for auto-assigning. Does not add assignees for pkg/dns folder as we are moving it out.
@thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adds kubernetes.io link for dns autoscaler addon
The [official page for DNS Horizontal Autoscaling](http://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/dns-horizontal-autoscaling/) is available on kubernetes.io after 1.5 release. Putting the link into this dns autoscaler addon folder as well.
@bowei
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39146, 39094)
cleanup last e2e authorization failures
Builds on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39080. This adds rbac role bindings during e2e tests for test that use SA permissions to loopback to the API server.
Assigned to me until its ready.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make fluentd pods critical
Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/38322
Make fluentd critical so it will be evicted with less probability.
CC @piosz @fgrzadkowski
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add liveness probe for fluentd-gcp
It's known that fluentd can hung up during execution until manual restart.
Liveness probe fixes this problem in the following way: if no buffer chunks were sent or created in the last 5 minutes, fluentd is hanging and should be restarted.
CC @piosz
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39061, 39079)
Fixed cluster validation: added -q flag to gcloud.
Fixed cluster validation in multi-zone mode: added -q flag to gcloud.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix typo for federation/*
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Increase code readability for this new member in v1.5
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Could we develop a typo-fix bot along with a k8s terminology dictionary ?
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
To add local registry to libvirt_coreos
`libvirt_coreos` is quick way to have a multi-node cluster on a linux laptop for development purpouse.
This PR adds local registry to libvirt_coreos cluster. Mind have a look?
@roberthbailey since you reviewed my last PR on dns for libvirt_coreos
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update reference to dns sidecar (was dnsmasq-metrics); remove exec-healthz
-The image path is wrong -- I am waiting for the CI to pass here before pushing to google_containers-
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Coreos kube-up now with less cloud init
This update includes significant refactoring. It moves almost all of the
logic into bash scripts, modeled after the `gci` cluster scripts.
The reason to do this is:
1. Avoid duplicating the saltbase manifests by reusing gci's parsing logic (easier maintenance)
2. Take an incremental step towards sharing more code between gci/trusty/coreos, again for better maintenance
3. Pave the way for making future changes (e.g. improved rkt support, kubelet support) easier to share
The primary differences from the gci scripts are the following:
1. Use of the `/opt/kubernetes` directory over `/home/kubernetes`
2. Support for rkt as a runtime
3. No use of logrotate
4. No use of `/etc/default/`
5. No logic related to noexec mounts or gci-specific firewall-stuff
It will make sense to move 2 over to gci, as well as perhaps a few other small improvements. That will be a separate PR for ease of review.
Ref #29720, this is a part of that because it removes a copy of them.
Fixes#24165
cc @yifan-gu
Since this logic largely duplicates logic from the gci folder, it would be nice if someone closely familiar with that gave an OK or made sure I didn't fall into any gotchas related to that, so cc @andyzheng0831
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Moved kubemark master from Debian to GCI
This PR fixes issue #37484
Kubemark master now runs on GCI instead of Debian, taking it one step closer to a real cluster master.
Primary changes:
1. changing master VM image/OS in kubemark's config-default.sh to debian
2. moving kubelet to systemd from supervisord
3. changing directory for cert/key/csv files from /srv/kubernetes to /etc/srv/kubernetes
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: cluster/juju
cc @castrojo @mbruzek @chuckbutler @marcoceppi
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
common.sh should load before kube-down/kube-up function called
#38921 common.sh should load before kube-down/kube-up function called,now it load in kube-down/kube-up function,so can't find verify-kube-binaries command
This update includes significant refactoring. It moves almost all of the
logic into bash scripts, modeled after the `gci` cluster scripts.
The primary differences between the two are the following:
1. Use of the `/opt/kubernetes` directory over `/home/kubernetes`
2. Support for rkt as a runtime
3. No use of logrotate
4. No use of `/etc/default/`
5. No logic related to noexec mounts or gci-specific firewall-stuff
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38906, 38808)
change the version in the yaml file
change the version in heapster-controller.yaml with image version
Automatic merge from submit-queue
cluster/gce/coreos: add OWNERS
See #33965 for context.
The code in `cluster/gce/coreos` has mostly been written/maintained by @yifan-gu and myself thusfar, so I added our names to the owner list.
@ethernetdan has also volunteered as well (thanks!).
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @roberthbailey
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Admit critical pods in the kubelet
Haven't verified in a live cluster yet, just unittested, so applying do-not-merge label.
