Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51102, 50712, 51037, 51044, 51059)
[sig-network-e2e] Remove redundant sig prefix from tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove redundant sig prefix from:
```
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for endpoint-Service: http
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for endpoint-Service: udp
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for node-Service: http
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for node-Service: udp
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for pod-Service: http
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should function for pod-Service: udp
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should update endpoints: http
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should update endpoints: udp
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should update nodePort: http [Slow]
[sig-network] Networking [sig-network] Granular Checks: Services [Slow] should update nodePort: udp [Slow]
[sig-network] Loadbalancing: L7 [sig-network] GCE [Slow] [Feature:Ingress] should conform to Ingress spec
[sig-network] Loadbalancing: L7 [sig-network] GCE [Slow] [Feature:Ingress] should create ingress with given static-ip
```
Umbrella issue #49161
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @xiangpengzhao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50967, 50505, 50706, 51033, 51028)
Fix GC integration test race
During TestCreateWithNonExistentOwner, when creating a pod with a
non-existent owner, assume it's possible the pod will be deleted before
we start checking for the pod's existence. Assuming that the pod still
exists immediately after Create returns is flaky if the GC reacts very
quickly.
```release-note
NONE
```
Might fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/50943; without the additional test context provided by this PR, it's not entirely possible to assess the root cause of the reported failure (as we don't know whether the original assertion failure was due to there being 0 or >1 pods).
/cc @caesarxuchao
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50967, 50505, 50706, 51033, 51028)
Revert "Merge pull request #51008 from kubernetes/revert-50789-fix-scheme"
I'm spinning up a cluster right now to test this fix, but I'm pretty sure this was the problem.
There doesn't seem to be a way to confirm from logs, because AFAICT the logs from the hollow kubelet containers are not collected as part of the kubemark test.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This reverts commit f4afdecef8, reversing
changes made to e633a1604f.
This also fixes a bug where Kubemark was still using the core api scheme
to manipulate the Kubelet's types, which was the cause of the initial
revert.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#51007
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/cc @shyamjvs @wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Should generate files before scheduler perf
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
For a newly cloned project, generated files are not included. Then scheduler_perf will fail:
```
undefined: openapi.GetOpenAPIDefinitions
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
fixes: #51090
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50893, 50913, 50963, 50629, 50640)
Increase latency threshold for list api calls
This is only a short-term solution to make our density test green. In the long-term, we should measure as per our new SLIs.
From @wojtek-t's [doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q5qxdeBPgTTIXZxdsFILg7kgqWhvOwY8uROEf0j5YBw) on the new SLIs/SLOs, we have the following SLO for list calls:
```
SLO1: In default Kubernetes installation, 99th percentile of SLI2 per cluster-day:
<= 1s if total number of objects of the same type as resource in the system <= X
<= 5s if total number of objects of the same type as resource in the system <= Y
<= 30s if total number of objects of the same types as resource in the system <= Z
```
I would guess that 170,000 pods would fall into the 2nd bracket (at least) and hence the new value of 5s. WDYT?
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Revert #50362.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: part of #50884
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
Add instance metadata from flag even when using image config.
Also add instance metadata from flag even when we are using image config.
* Sometimes we need to dynamically generate instance metadata, it's troublesome to put them into image config.
* Sometimes we want to apply instance metadata to all images, it's duplicated to add them to each image in the image config.
/assign @yguo0905 Could you help me review this?
This reverts commit f4afdecef8, reversing
changes made to e633a1604f.
This also fixes a bug where Kubemark was still using the core api scheme
to manipulate the Kubelet's types, which was the cause of the initial
revert.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
Made the difference between scale-up timeout and cluster set-up timeout explicit.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
During TestCreateWithNonExistentOwner, when creating a pod with a
non-existent owner, assume it's possible the pod will be deleted before
we start checking for the pod's existence. Assuming that the pod still
exists immediately after Create returns is flaky if the GC reacts very
quickly.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46512, 50146)
Make metav1.(Micro)?Time functions take pointers
Is there any reason for those functions not to be on pointers?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50904, 50691)
Stackdriver Logging e2e: Explicitly check for docker and kubelet logs presence
Check for kubelet and docker logs explicitly in the Stackdriver Logging e2e tests
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add enj to OWNERS for test/integration/etcd/etcd_storage_path_test.go
@deads2k is the bot smart enough to not spam me with every test change? Perhaps I should create an `OWNERS` file in `test/integration/etcd`?
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
CollisionCount should have type int32 across controllers that use it for collision avoidance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#50530
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @liyinan926
/assign @kow3ns @thockin @janetkuo
**Release note**:
```release-note
Change CollisionCount from int64 to int32 across controllers
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50277, 50823, 50376, 50867)
Move e2e taints test file to sig-scheduling
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Move taint test file to e2e scheduling and add sig-scheduling prefix.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
none
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Change API version of statefulset scale subresource e2e test to v1beta2
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR changes API version of statefulset scale subresource e2e test from `v1beta1` to `v1beta2`.
`apps/v1beta2` has been enabled.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #50109
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50281, 50747, 50347, 50834, 50852)
Add e2e aggregator test.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds an e2e test for aggregation based on the sample-apiserver.
Currently is uses a sample-apiserver built as of 1.7.
This should ensure that the aggregation system works end-to-end.
It will also help detect if we break "old" extension api servers.
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes
fixes#43714
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50563, 50698, 50796)
Add ControllerRevision to apps/v1beta2
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR added `ControllerRevision` currently in `apps/v1beta1` to `apps/v1beta2`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#50696.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@kow3ns @janetkuo
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add ControllerRevision to apps/v1beta2
```
What this PR does / why we need it:
This adds an e2e test for aggregation based on the sample-apiserver.
Currently is uses a sample-apiserver built as of 1.7.
This should ensure that the aggregation system works end-to-end.
It will also help detect if we break "old" extension api servers.
Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes
fixes#43714
Fixed bazel for the change.
Fixed # of args issue from govet.
Added code to test dynamic.Client.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Migrate sig-apimachinery and sig-servicecatalog e2e tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Migrate sig-apimachinery and sig-servicecatalog e2e tests
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
1. Move generated_clientset.go to sig-apimachinary
2. Move podpreset.go to sig-servicecatalog by creating new directory.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
none
/cc @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50550, 50768)
Don't SSH to master for metrics in case of GKE
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @crassirostris
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add some e2e for node authz
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix#47174
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47174
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Promote CronJobs to batch/v1beta1 - just the API
This PR promotes CronJobs to beta.
@erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-api-reviews @kubernetes/api-approvers ptal
This builds on top of #41890 and needs #40932 as well
```release-note
Promote CronJobs to batch/v1beta1.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50711, 50742, 50204)
fix panic in e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix#50660
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
no
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50670, 50332)
e2e test for local storage mount point
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We discovered that kubernetes can treat local directories and actual mountpoints differently. For example, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48331. The current local storage e2e tests use directories.
This PR introduces a test that creates a tmpfs and mounts it, and runs one of the local storage e2e tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49126
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I cherrypicked PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50177, since local storage e2e tests are broken in master on 2017-08-08 due to "no such host" error. This PR replaces NodeExec with SSH commands.
You can run the tests using the following commands:
```
$ NUM_NODES=1 KUBE_FEATURE_GATES="PersistentLocalVolumes=true" go run hack/e2e.go -- -v --up
$ go run hack/e2e.go -- -v --test --test_args="--ginkgo.focus=\[Feature:LocalPersistentVolumes\]"
```
Here are the summary of results from my test run:
```
Ran 9 of 651 Specs in 387.905 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 9 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 642 Skipped PASS
Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 6m29.369318483s
Test Suite Passed
2017/08/08 11:54:01 util.go:133: Step './hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=\[Feature:LocalPersistentVolumes\]' finished in 6m32.077462612s
```
**Release note**:
`NONE`
