Individual implementations are not yet being moved.
Fixed all dependencies which call the interface.
Fixed golint exceptions to reflect the move.
Added project info as per @dims and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project.
Added dims to the security contacts.
Fixed minor issues.
Added missing template files.
Copied ControllerClientBuilder interface to cp.
This allows us to break the only dependency on K8s/K8s.
Added TODO to ControllerClientBuilder.
Fixed GoDeps.
Factored in feedback from JustinSB.
- Use VolumeAvaiable instead of empty or pending phase in tests
- Add a test case to verify findMatchingVolume will not choose
non-avaiable PVs if it's not pre-bind
- Add a test case to verify syncClaim will not choose non-avaibalbe PVs
if it's not pre-bind
* FindPodVolumes
* Prebound PVCs are treated like unbound immediate PVCs and will error
* Always check for fully bound PVCs and cache bindings for not fully
bound PVCs
* BindPodVolumes
* Retry API updates for not fully bound PVCs even if the assume cache
already marked it
* Wait for PVCs to be fully bound after making the API updates
* Error when detecting binding/provisioning failure conditions
If PV is bound by external PV binder (e.g. kube-scheduler), it's
possible on heavy load that corresponding PVC is not synced to
controller local cache yet.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65570, 65616). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Retry scheduling on StorageClass events
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56163
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have taken over #60006.
It's hard to test in e2e, because we cannot know reschedule of pod is triggered by which event (periodically service/node events will move pods to active queue too). ~~I'll add integration tests for this functionality after [this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65296) get merged.~~ (already added)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add lichuqiang as reviewer of persistentvolume controller (for volume scheduling)
Now that I've been working on the storage topology-aware feature for quite a time. Really hope that I can help do some review.
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Volume topology aware dynamic provisioning: work based on new API
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The PR has been split to 3 parts:
Part1: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63232 for basic scheduler and PV controller plumbing
Part2: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63233 for API change
and the PR itself includes work based on the API change:
- Dynamic provisioning allowed topologies scheduler work
- Update provisioning interface to be aware of selected node and topology
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Feature: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/561
Design: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/2168
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig storage
/sig scheduling
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane @saad-ali @bsalamat
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
Volume topology aware dynamic provisioning
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62694, 62569, 62646, 61633, 62433). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Report events to apiserver in local volume plugin.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/62102#discussion_r179238429.
Report events to apiserver in local volume plugin.
- Add VolumeHost.GetEventRecorder() method
- Add related e2e tests
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#62248
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Example output of `kubectl describe pods`:
```
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 7s default-scheduler Successfully assigned e2e-tests-persistent-local-volumes-test-x4h5x/security-context-670da435-4174-11e8-9098-000c29bb0377 to 127.0.0.1
Warning AlreadyMountedVolume 7s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 The requested fsGroup is 4321, but the volume local-pvfbb76 has GID 1234. The volume may not be shareable.
Normal SuccessfulMountVolume 7s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 MountVolume.SetUp succeeded for volume "default-token-996xr"
Normal SuccessfulMountVolume 7s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 MountVolume.SetUp succeeded for volume "local-pvfbb76"
Normal Pulled 6s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 Container image "k8s.gcr.io/busybox:1.24" already present on machine
Normal Created 6s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 Created container
Normal Started 6s kubelet, 127.0.0.1 Started container
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62448, 59317, 59947, 62418, 62352). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add binding error message for volumeMode:Block unsupported case
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a binding error message for volumeMode:Block
unsupported case.
With this message, users can understand why PV is not bound to
PVC on dynamic provisioning.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes: #59942
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mtanino
/sig storage
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This commit adds a binding error message for volumeMode:Block
unsupported case.
With this message, users can understand why PV is not bound to
PVC on both dynamic provisioning and manually creating volume.
This patch works as follows:
- In syncVolume, before adding the claim to claimQueue, check if
there is a volumeMode mismatch, and if there is, record the
event for both pv and pvc and skip adding to the queue.
fixes: #59942
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add msau42 to approvers for volume scheduling
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add me as an approver for the volume scheduling code
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61918, 62180, 62198). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use provided node object in volume binding predicate
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Autoscaler creates fake node objects, so we should use the provided node object instead of looking up the node from the informer.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#62178
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61806, 61508, 62075, 62079, 62052). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
make use of auto generated LoadBalancerStatus.DeepCopy
Remove LoadBalancerStatusDeepCopy in helpers.go, and use the auto generated `LoadBalancerStatus.DeepCopy` in pkg/apis/core/zz_generated.deepcopy.go.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move volume scheduling and local storage to beta
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* Move the feature gates and APIs for volume scheduling and local storage to beta
* Update tests to use the beta fields
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#59390
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
ACTION REQUIRED: VolumeScheduling and LocalPersistentVolume features are beta and enabled by default. The PersistentVolume NodeAffinity alpha annotation is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.
```
