**What type of PR is this?**
/kind cleanup
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
$ hack/verify-golint.sh
Errors from golint:
pkg/cloudprovider/providers/aws/aws_fakes.go:357:9: if block ends with a return statement, so drop this else and outdent its block
pkg/volume/util/util.go:204:9: if block ends with a return statement, so drop this else and outdent its block
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
This corrects a problem where valid security group ports were removed
unintentionally when updating a service or when node changes occur.
Fixes#60825, #64148
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
When the cloud-controller-manager is running with PV label initializing controller
and NFS volume is created, it causes nill reference error.
fixes#68996
The previous version forced us to create AWS IAM Policies that are too
permissive when dealing with volumes. That's because:
1. Volumes were created without tags that identifies the new resource as
managed by the cluster. So technically the resourse, at creation time,
is not owned by the cluster.
2. Tags were added to the volume making the resource now managed by the
cluster. The problem being that it could make ANY volume as managed by the
cluster. Thus allowing resources that aren't really part of the cluster,
or part of no cluster at all, to become a resource managed by the cluster.
By combining the operations we can both make the code simpler, since we
don't need to deal with deleting a volume in case we can't apply tags to
it, plus the security model gets a nice improvement.
Individual implementations are not yet being moved.
Fixed all dependencies which call the interface.
Fixed golint exceptions to reflect the move.
Added project info as per @dims and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project.
Added dims to the security contacts.
Fixed minor issues.
Added missing template files.
Copied ControllerClientBuilder interface to cp.
This allows us to break the only dependency on K8s/K8s.
Added TODO to ControllerClientBuilder.
Fixed GoDeps.
Factored in feedback from JustinSB.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67332, 66737, 67281, 67173). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use aws.StringSlice replace of deprecated func stringPointerArray
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
use aws.StringSlice replace of deprecated func stringPointerArray
```
// stringPointerArray creates a slice of string pointers from a slice of strings
// Deprecated: consider using aws.StringSlice - but note the slightly different behaviour with a nil input
func stringPointerArray(orig []string) []*string {
if orig == nil {
return nil
}
return aws.StringSlice(orig)
}
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67061, 66589, 67121, 67149). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Get load balancer name per provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
GetLoadBalancerName() should be implemented per cloud provider as opposed to one neutral implementation.
This PR will address this by moving `cloudprovider.GetLoadBalancerName()` to the `LoadBalancer interface` and then provide an implementation for each cloud provider, while maintaining previously expected functionality.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes [#43173](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43173)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a work in progress. Looking for feedback as I work on this, from any interested parties.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
scope AWS LoadBalancer security group ICMP rules to spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges
/sig aws
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make the client CIDR ranges for MTU consistent with what [the documentation appears to describe](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#type-loadbalancer), where the ranges should be equal to `spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges` if supplied.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#63564
**Release note**:
```release-note
scope AWS LoadBalancer security group ICMP rules to spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65730, 66615, 66684, 66519, 66510). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add DynamicProvisioningScheduling support for EBS
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds support for the DynamicProvisioningScheduling feature in EBS. With this in place, if VolumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer is specified in a EBS storageclass and DynamicProvisioningScheduling is enabled, EBS provisioner will use the selected node's LabelZoneFailureDomain as the zone to provision the EBS volume in.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Related to #63232
Sample `describe pv` output with NodeAffinity populated:
```
~$ kubectl describe pv pvc-f9d2138b-7e3e-11e8-a4ea-064124617820
Name: pvc-f9d2138b-7e3e-11e8-a4ea-064124617820
Labels: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=us-west-2
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=us-west-2a
Annotations: kubernetes.io/createdby=aws-ebs-dynamic-provisioner
pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller=yes
pv.kubernetes.io/provisioned-by=kubernetes.io/aws-ebs
Finalizers: [kubernetes.io/pv-protection]
StorageClass: slow3
Status: Bound
Claim: default/pvc3
Reclaim Policy: Delete
Access Modes: RWO
Capacity: 6Gi
Node Affinity:
Required Terms:
Term 0: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [us-west-2a]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [us-west-2]
Message:
Source:
Type: AWSElasticBlockStore (a Persistent Disk resource in AWS)
VolumeID: aws://us-west-2a/vol-0fc1cdae7d10860f6
FSType: ext4
Partition: 0
ReadOnly: false
Events: <none>
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66464, 66488). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Avoid overflowing int64 in RoundUpSize and return error if overflow int
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are many places in plugins (some I may have missed) that we naively convert a resource.Quantity.Value() which is an int64, to an int, which may be only 32 bits long.
Background, optional to read :): Kubernetes canonicalizes resource.Quantities, and from what I have seen testing creating PVCs, decimalSI is the default. If a quantity is in `decimalSI` format and its value in bytes would overflow an int64, e.g. `10E`, nothing happens. If it is in binarySI and its value in bytes would overflow an int64, e.g. `10Ei`, it is set down to 2^63-1 and there's no overflow of the field value. But there may be overflow later in the code which is what this PR is addressing.
* Change `RoundUpSize` implementation to avoid overflowing `int64`
* Add `RoundUp*Int` functions for use when an `int` is expected instead of an `int64`, because `int` may be 32bits and naively doing `int($INT64_VALUE)` can lead to silent overflow. These functions return an error if overflow has occurred.
* Rename `*GB` variables to `*GiB` where appropriate for maximum clarity
* Use `RoundUpToGiB` instead of `RoundUpSize` where possible
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: please review carefully as we don't have e2e tests for most plugins!
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
edit: remove 'we do not need to worry about...'. yes we do, i worded that badly :))
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
