- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The functionality to bootstrap node certificates is ready but is blocked
by a seperable issue discussed in:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1982. The functionality
could be useful for power users who want to write their own approvers if
the feature could be promoted to beta. In it's current state this
feature doesn't help anybody.
I propose that we remove automated approval of node serving certificates
for now and work towards getting the node functionality to beta.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59441, 58264, 59287, 59396, 59439). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix some log param error
this patch fix some log parameter mistakes.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
/release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix pkg/ depends on cmd/ problems
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Partial fix for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/53341
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No logic changes, Just moving things around
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49615, 49321, 49982, 49788, 50355)
csr: add resync to csr approver
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49787
```release-note
Fix an issue where if a CSR is not approved initially by the SAR approver is not retried.
```
This makes it so that only the controller loop talks to the
API server directly. The signatures for Sign and Approve also
become more consistent, while allowing the Signer to report
conditions (which it wasn't able to do before).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
