Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update owners file for job and cronjob controller
I've just noticed we have outdated OWNERS files for job and cronjob controllers.
@erictune ptal
@kubernetes/sig-contributor-experience-pr-reviews fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40345, 38183, 40236, 40861, 40900)
refactor approver and signer interfaces to be consisten w.r.t. apiserver interaction
This makes it so that only the controller loop talks to the
API server directly. The signatures for Sign and Approve also
become more consistent, while allowing the Signer to report
conditions (which it wasn't able to do before).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Promote SubjectAccessReview to v1
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
SubjectAccessReview
- [webhook authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/#webhook-mode)
- [kubelet delegated authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authorization)
- add-on API server delegated authorization
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating access
- A typo was discovered in the SubjectAccessReviewSpec Groups field name
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1, with the only change being the typo fix to the groups field. (fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32709)
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authorization.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
federation: Refactoring namespaced resources deletion code from kube ns controller and sharing it with fed ns controller
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33612
Refactoring code in kube namespace controller to delete all resources in a namespace when the namespace is deleted. Refactored this code into a separate NamespacedResourcesDeleter class and calling it from federation namespace controller.
This is required for enabling cascading deletion of namespaced resources in federation apiserver.
Before this PR, we were directly deleting the namespaced resources and assuming that they go away immediately. With cascading deletion, we will have to wait for the corresponding controllers to first delete the resources from underlying clusters and then delete the resource from federation control plane. NamespacedResourcesDeleter has this waiting logic.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-misc @caesarxuchao @derekwaynecarr @mwielgus
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
This makes it so that only the controller loop talks to the
API server directly. The signatures for Sign and Approve also
become more consistent, while allowing the Signer to report
conditions (which it wasn't able to do before).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update daemon set controller OWNERS file
Adding myself as reviewer, adding @mikedanese as approver
cc @kargakis @lukasredynk
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35782, 35831, 39279, 40853, 40867)
genericapiserver: cut off more dependencies – episode 7
Follow-up of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40822
approved based on #40363
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40810, 40695)
Prevent pv controller from forcefully overwrite provisioned volume name
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a fix to prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it overwrites the volume's name only when it is missing. This allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
This PR does not have an issue affiliated, but it will allow PR #38924 to properly implement dynamically provisioned volume in namespaces other than default.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39169, 40719, 38954, 40808, 40689)
Add StatefulSets checks at Service level
Hi!
Please let me propose some very small e2e testsuite enhancement.
This PR removed a `TODO` about checking governing service at unit test level (which is hard) and adds this to e2e testsuite.
Thanks
Sebastian
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 34543, 40606)
sync client-go and move util/workqueue
The vision of client-go is that it provides enough utilities to build a reasonable controller. It has been copying `util/workqueue`. This makes it authoritative.
@liggitt I'm getting really close to making client-go authoritative ptal.
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
