Pod and burstable QoS cgroups should take overhead of running a sandbox
into account if the PodOverhead feature is enabled. These helper
functions are utilized by Kubelet for sizing the pod and burstable QoS
cgroups.
Pod overhead is added to resource requests, regardless of the initial
request values. A particular resource pod overhead is only added to a
resource limit if a non-zero limit already existed.
This commit updates eviction handling to also take Pod Overhead into
account (if the feature is enabled).
Signed-off-by: Eric Ernst <eric.ernst@intel.com>
Update GetResoureqRequest function to utilize a new helper,
GetResourceRequestQuantity. This logic was duplicated in a couple of
areas in the K/K codebase, so consolidating for better test coverage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ernst <eric.ernst@intel.com>
* merge pkg/api/v1/node with pkg/util/node
* update test case for utilnode
* remove package pkg/api/v1/node
* move isNodeReady to internal func
* Split GetNodeCondition into e2e and controller pkg
* fix import errors
As cited in
https://github.com/kubernetes/dns/issues/174 - this is documented to
work, and I don't see why it shouldn't work. We allowed the definition
of headless services without ports, but apparently nobody tested it very
well.
Manually tested clusterIP services with no ports - validation error.
Manually tested services with negative ports - validation error.
New tests failed, output inspected and verified. Now pass.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55600, 67386). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove deplicate code for PodRequestsAndLimits
remove deplicate code for PodRequestsAndLimits
add unit test for PodRequestsAndLimits
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67399, 67471, 66815, 67301, 55840). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add unit test for v1.configmap and remove replicate code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove dead code in pkg/api
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
remove dead code
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49865, 53731, 54013, 54513, 51502). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
ScaleIO - Ability to specify Secret's name and namespace
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is to decouple the ScaleIO secret from the same namespace as that of the StorageClass/PVC/PV that uses it (#53619). Currently, authorized non-admin k8s user, who creates volumes, may end up having unauthorized access to ScaleIO secret information. This PR introduces secret parameter that allows specification of secret's namespace.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53619
**Release note**:
```release-note
ScaleIO persistent volumes now support referencing a secret in a namespace other than the bound persistent volume claim's namespace; this is controlled during provisioning with the `secretNamespace` storage class parameter; StoragePool and ProtectionDomain attributes no longer defaults to the value `default`
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54081, 54271, 51783, 54600, 54594). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add unit tests in /pkg/api/v1helper
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
add unit tests in /pkg/api/v1helper
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
ref #49384
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
