There were several sshPort values in e2e test packages because
we've migrated code from e2e framework by copying and pastting.
This adds common SSHPort on e2essh package to reduce such duplicated
code.
Conformance tests must not rely on the kubelet API in order to
pass. In this case, I think it's unnecessary to verify that a
kubelet observes the deletion within gracePeriod seconds. The
remaining checks in this test verify that pod deletion happens,
and that the pod is removed.
Conformance tests must not rely on the kubelet API in order to
pass. SchedulerPredicates tests attempt to use the kubelet API
in their BeforeEach, some of which are tagged as Conformance.
Is there a compelling reason to use the kubelet's view of pods
for a given node instead of the apiserver's view of the pods?
we print yaml, so you can use yaml tools like `yq`:
```
e2e.test --list-conformance-tests | yq r - --collect *.testname
```
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
it turns out that the e2e test was not using the timeout used to
hold the CLOSE_WAIT status, hence the test was flake depending
on how fast it checked the conntrack table.
This PR replaces the dependency on ssh using a pod to check the conntrack
entries on the host in a loop, to make the test more robust
and reduce the flakiness due to race conditions and/or ssh issues.
It also fixes a bug trying to grep the conntrack entry, where
the error was swallowed if a conntrack entry wasn't found.
Sometimes the pod has already been cleaned up by the time the test
tried to grab the logs.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting for client-a-jt4tf to complete.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "client-a-jt4tf" in namespace "e2e-network-policy-c-9007" to be "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:38.072: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 6.270302ms
Mar 27 16:19:40.078: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 2.01233019s
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Succeeded", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 4.020186873s
STEP: Saw pod success
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf" satisfied condition "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:42.093: FAIL: Error getting container logs: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods client-a-jt4tf)
Full Stack Trace
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.checkNoConnectivity(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0xc001666400, 0xc000c32000)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1457 +0x2a0
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.testCannotConnect(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0x55587e9, 0x8, 0xc000c32000, 0x50)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1406 +0x1fc
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func13.2.7()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:285 +0x883
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001e47830, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:59 +0x41f
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:238 +0x15d
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:826 +0x460
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x60d2d00, 0x9887ec8)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:914 +0x2fb
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:864
main.main.func1(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:59 +0x9c
main.main()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:60 +0x341
STEP: Cleaning up the pod client-a-jt4tf
STEP: Cleaning up the policy.
RestartControllerManager() is kube-controller specific function
and it is better to separate the function as subpackage of e2e
test framework.
In addition, the function made invalid dependency into e2essh.
So this separates the function into e2ekubesystem subpackage.
