Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38796, 40823, 40756, 41083, 41105)
Let ReadLogs return when there is a read error.
Fixes a bug in kuberuntime log.
Today, @yujuhong found that once we cancel `kubectl logs -f` with `Ctrl+C`, kuberuntime will keep complaining:
```
27939 kuberuntime_logs.go:192] Failed with err write tcp 10.240.0.4:10250->10.240.0.2:53913: write: broken pipe when writing log for log file "/var/log/pods/5bb76510-ed71-11e6-ad02-42010af00002/busybox_0.log": &{timestamp:{sec:63622095387 nsec:625309193 loc:0x484c440} stream:stdout log:[84 117 101 32 70 101 98 32 32 55 32 50 48 58 49 54 58 50 55 32 85 84 67 32 50 48 49 55 10]}
```
This is because kuberuntime keeps writing to the connection even though it is already closed. Actually, kuberuntime should return and report error whenever there is a writing error.
Ref the [docker code](3a4ae1f661/pkg/stdcopy/stdcopy.go (L159-L167))
I'm still creating the cluster and verifying this fix. Will post the result here after that.
/cc @yujuhong @kubernetes/sig-node-bugs
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38796, 40823, 40756, 41083, 41105)
e2e tests for vSphere cloud provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR contains changes for existing e2e volume provisioning test cases for running on vsphere cloud provider.
**Following is the summary of changes made in existing e2e test cases**
**Added test/e2e/persistent_volumes-vsphere.go**
- This test verifies deleting a PVC before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach and deleting the PV before the pod does not cause pod deletion to fail on PD detach.
**test/e2e/volume_provisioning.go**
- This test creates a StorageClass and claim with dynamic provisioning and alpha dynamic provisioning annotations and verifies that required volumes are getting created. Test also verifies that created volume is readable and retaining data.
- Added vsphere as supported cloud provider. Also set pluginName to "kubernetes.io/vsphere-volume" for vsphere cloud provider.
**test/e2e/volumes.go**
- Added test spec for vsphere
- This test creates requested volume, mount it on the pod, write some random content at /opt/0/index.html and verifies file contents are perfect to make sure we don't see the content from previous test runs.
- This test also passes "1234" as fsGroup to mount volume and verifies fsGroup is set correctly.
**added test/e2e/vsphere_utils.go**
- Added function verifyVSphereDiskAttached - Verify the persistent disk attached to the node.
- Added function waitForVSphereDiskToDetach - Wait until vsphere vmdk is deteched from the given node or time out after 5 minutes
- Added getVSpherePersistentVolumeSpec - create vsphere volume spec with given VMDK volume path, Reclaim Policy and labels
- Added getVSpherePersistentVolumeClaimSpec - get vsphere persistent volume spec with given selector labels
- createVSphereVolume - function to create vmdk volume
**Following is the summary of new e2e tests added with this PR**
**test/e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go**
- contains volume placement tests using node label selector
- Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with the same volume source on the same worker node
- Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with the same volume source attach/detach to different worker nodes
**test/e2e/pv_reclaimpolicy.go**
- contains tests for PV/PVC - Reclaiming Policy
- Test verifies persistent volume should be deleted when reclaimPolicy on the PV is set to delete and associated claim is deleted
- Test also verified that persistent volume should be retained when reclaimPolicy on the PV is set to retain and associated claim is deleted
**test/e2e/pvc_label_selector.go**
- This is function test for Selector-Label Volume Binding Feature.
- Verify volume with the matching label is bounded with the PVC.
Other changes
Updated pkg/cloudprovider/providers/vsphere/BUILD and test/e2e/BUILD
**Which issue this PR fixes** *
fixes # 41087
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Updated tests were executed on kubernetes v1.4.8 release on vsphere.
Test steps are provided in comments
@kerneltime @BaluDontu
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38796, 40823, 40756, 41083, 41105)
Add unit tests for interactive edit command
Before updating edit to use unstructured objects and use generic JSON patching, we need better test coverage of the existing paths. This adds unit tests for the interactive edit scenarios.
This PR adds:
* Simple framework for recording tests for interactive edit:
* record.go is a tiny test server that records editor and API inputs as test expectations, and editor and API outputs as playback stubs
* record_editor.sh is a shell script that sends the before/after of an interactive `vi` edit to the test server
* record_testcase.sh (see README) starts up the test server, sets up a kubeconfig to proxy to the test server, sets EDITOR to invoke record_editor.sh, then opens a shell that lets you use `kubectl edit` normally
* Adds test cases for the following scenarios:
- [x] no-op edit (open and close without making changes)
- [x] try to edit a missing object
- [x] edit single item successfully
- [x] edit list of items successfully
- [x] edit a single item, submit with an error, re-edit, submit fixed successfully
- [x] edit list of items, submit some with errors and some good, re-edit errors, submit fixed
- [x] edit trying to change immutable things like name/version/kind, ensure preconditions prevent submission
- [x] edit in "create mode" successfully (`kubectl create -f ... --edit`)
- [x] edit in "create mode" introducing errors (`kubectl create -f ... --edit`)
* Fixes a bug with edit printing errors to stdout (caught when testing stdout/stderr against expected output)
Follow-ups:
- [ ] clean up edit code path
- [ ] switch edit to use unstructured objects
- [ ] make edit fall back to jsonmerge for objects without registered go structs (TPR, unknown versions of pods, etc)
- [ ] add tests:
- [ ] edit TPR
- [ ] edit mix of TPR and known objects
- [ ] edit known object with extra field from server
- [ ] edit known object with new version from server
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38796, 40823, 40756, 41083, 41105)
kubelet/network-cni-plugin: modify the log's info
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Checking the startup logs of kubelet, i can always find a error like this:
"E1215 10:19:24.891724 2752 cni.go:163] error updating cni config: No networks found in /etc/cni/net.d"
It will appears, neither i use cni network-plugin or not.
After analysis codes, i thought it should be a warn log, because it will not produce any actions like as exit or abort, and just ignored when not any valid plugins exit.
thank you!
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)
move --runtime-config to kubeapiserver
`--runtime-config` is only useful if you have a lot of API groups in one server. If you have a single API group in your server (the vast majority of aggregated API servers), then the flag is unneeded and relatively complex. This moves it to closer to point of use.
@sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41103, 41042, 41097, 40946, 40770)
Use Clientset interface in KubeletDeps
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This replaces the Clientset struct with the equivalent interface for the KubeClient injected via KubeletDeps. This is useful for testing and for accessing the Node and Pod status event stream without an API server.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Follow up to #4907
**Release note**:
`NONE`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41103, 41042, 41097, 40946, 40770)
dockershim: set security option separators based on the docker version
Also add a version cache to avoid hitting the docker daemon frequently.
This is part of #38164
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add gnufied as reviewer for aws and gce volumes
Adding myself as reviewer for aws and gce volume plugins. I understand the code well enough and have helped with review in those areas already.
cc @childsb @justinsb @saad-ali
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add OWNERS to the dockertools package
We are in the middle of switching to the CRI implementation. It's critical to minimize
the development of dockertools to avoid any more diversion. We should freeze any
non-essential changes to dockertools once CRI becomes the default. This change
adds an OWNERS file with a small group of people to ensure no unintentional changes
go through unnoticed.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update owners file for job and cronjob controller
I've just noticed we have outdated OWNERS files for job and cronjob controllers.
@erictune ptal
@kubernetes/sig-contributor-experience-pr-reviews fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40345, 38183, 40236, 40861, 40900)
refactor approver and signer interfaces to be consisten w.r.t. apiserver interaction
This makes it so that only the controller loop talks to the
API server directly. The signatures for Sign and Approve also
become more consistent, while allowing the Signer to report
conditions (which it wasn't able to do before).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40345, 38183, 40236, 40861, 40900)
remove the create-external-load-balancer flag in cmd/expose.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In cmd/expose.go there is a todo "remove create-external-load-balancer in code on or after Aug 25, 2016.", and now it's been a long time past. So I remove this flag and modify the test cases.
Please check for this, thanks!
**Release note**:
```
remove the deprecated flag "create-external-load-balancer" and use --type="LoadBalancer" instead.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Extract a number of short description strings for translation
@fabianofranz
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews
Follow on for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39223
addressed review comments
Addressed review comment for pv_reclaimpolicy.go to verify content of the volume
addressed 2nd round of review comments
addressed 3rd round of review comments from jeffvance
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41023, 41031, 40947)
apiserver command line options lead to config
Logically command line options lead to config, not the other way around. We're clean enough now we can actually do the inversion.
WIP because I have some test cycles to fix, but this is all the meat.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40980, 40985)
added short names for resources which are exposed during discovery
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The changes add short names for resources. The short names will be delivered to kubectl during discovery.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Validate unique against HostPort/Protocol/HostIP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We can bind to specific IPs however validation will fail for different HostIP:HostPort combination. This is a small fix to check combination of HostPort/Protocol/HostIP rather than just HostPort/Protocol.
Sample configuration
...
"ports": [
{
"protocol": "TCP",
"containerPort": 53,
"hostPort": 55,
"hostIP": "127.0.0.1",
"name": "dns-local-tcp"
},
{
"protocol": "TCP",
"containerPort": 53,
"hostPort": 55,
"hostIP": "127.0.0.2",
"name": "dns-local-tcp2"
}
]
Before:
* spec.template.spec.containers[1].ports[2].hostPort: Duplicate value: "55/TCP"
* spec.template.spec.containers[1].ports[3].hostPort: Duplicate value: "55/TCP"
After applying the patch:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:55 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3644/docker-proxy
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.2:55 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3629/docker-proxy
Thanks
Ashley
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Set docker opt separator correctly for SELinux options
This is based on @pmorie's commit from #40179
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Promote SubjectAccessReview to v1
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
SubjectAccessReview
- [webhook authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/#webhook-mode)
- [kubelet delegated authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authorization)
- add-on API server delegated authorization
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating access
- A typo was discovered in the SubjectAccessReviewSpec Groups field name
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1, with the only change being the typo fix to the groups field. (fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32709)
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authorization.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
federation: Refactoring namespaced resources deletion code from kube ns controller and sharing it with fed ns controller
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33612
Refactoring code in kube namespace controller to delete all resources in a namespace when the namespace is deleted. Refactored this code into a separate NamespacedResourcesDeleter class and calling it from federation namespace controller.
This is required for enabling cascading deletion of namespaced resources in federation apiserver.
Before this PR, we were directly deleting the namespaced resources and assuming that they go away immediately. With cascading deletion, we will have to wait for the corresponding controllers to first delete the resources from underlying clusters and then delete the resource from federation control plane. NamespacedResourcesDeleter has this waiting logic.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-misc @caesarxuchao @derekwaynecarr @mwielgus
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)
optimize duplicate openstack serverList judgement
if len(serverList) > 1, we will return err in pager.EachPage() function,so here we do not need to judge again
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)
Fixed a tiny bug on using RoleBindingGenerator
Fixed a typo bug while using RoleBindingGenerator, this
bug causes error when binding role to service accounts
through "kubectl create rolebinding" command.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add deads2k to registry package owners
I established the package layout and wrote a lot of the non-boilerplate code in this package.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40930, 40951)
Fix CRI port forwarding
Websocket support was introduced #33684, which broke the CRI
implementation. This change fixes it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40943, 40967)
Switch kubectl version and api-versions to create a discovery client …
…directly.
The clientset will throw an error for aggregated apiservers because the
clientset looks for specific versions of apis that are compiled into
the client. These will be missing from aggregated apiservers.
The discoveryclient is fully dynamic and does not rely on compiled
in apiversions.
```release-note
NONE
```
