The ipvs proxier was figuring out LoadBalancerSourceRanges matches in
the nat table and using KUBE-MARK-DROP to mark unmatched packets to be
dropped later. But with ipvs, unlike with iptables, DNAT happens after
the packet is "delivered" to the dummy interface, so the packet will
still be unmodified when it reaches the filter table (the first time)
so there's no reason to split the work between the nat and filter
tables; we can just do it all from the filter table and call DROP
directly.
Before:
- KUBE-LOAD-BALANCER (in nat) uses kubeLoadBalancerFWSet to match LB
traffic for services using LoadBalancerSourceRanges, and sends it
to KUBE-FIREWALL.
- KUBE-FIREWALL uses kubeLoadBalancerSourceCIDRSet and
kubeLoadBalancerSourceIPSet to match allowed source/dest combos
and calls "-j RETURN".
- All remaining traffic that doesn't escape KUBE-FIREWALL is sent to
KUBE-MARK-DROP.
- Traffic sent to KUBE-MARK-DROP later gets dropped by chains in
filter created by kubelet.
After:
- All INPUT and FORWARD traffic gets routed to KUBE-PROXY-FIREWALL
(in filter). (We don't use "KUBE-FIREWALL" any more because
there's already a chain in filter by that name that belongs to
kubelet.)
- KUBE-PROXY-FIREWALL sends traffic matching kubeLoadbalancerFWSet
to KUBE-SOURCE-RANGES-FIREWALL
- KUBE-SOURCE-RANGES-FIREWALL uses kubeLoadBalancerSourceCIDRSet and
kubeLoadBalancerSourceIPSet to match allowed source/dest combos
and calls "-j RETURN".
- All remaining traffic that doesn't escape
KUBE-SOURCE-RANGES-FIREWALL is dropped (directly via "-j DROP").
- (KUBE-LOAD-BALANCER in nat is now used only to set up masquerading)
28253f6030