Automatic merge from submit-queue
CRI: Handle cri in-place upgrade
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40051.
## How does this PR restart/remove legacy containers/sandboxes?
With this PR, dockershim will convert and return legacy containers and infra containers as regular containers/sandboxes. Then we can rely on the SyncPod logic to stop the legacy containers/sandboxes, and the garbage collector to remove the legacy containers/sandboxes.
To forcibly trigger restart:
* For infra containers, we manually set `hostNetwork` to opposite value to trigger a restart (See [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/kuberuntime_manager.go#L389))
* For application containers, they will be restarted with the infra container.
## How does this PR avoid extra overhead when there is no legacy container/sandbox?
For the lack of some labels, listing legacy containers needs extra `docker ps`. We should not introduce constant performance regression for legacy container cleanup. So we added the `legacyCleanupFlag`:
* In `ListContainers` and `ListPodSandbox`, only do extra `ListLegacyContainers` and `ListLegacyPodSandbox` when `legacyCleanupFlag` is `NotDone`.
* When dockershim starts, it will check whether there are legacy containers/sandboxes.
* If there are none, it will mark `legacyCleanupFlag` as `Done`.
* If there are any, it will leave `legacyCleanupFlag` as `NotDone`, and start a goroutine periodically check whether legacy cleanup is done.
This makes sure that there is overhead only when there are legacy containers/sandboxes not cleaned up yet.
## Caveats
* In-place upgrade will cause kubelet to restart all running containers.
* RestartNever container will not be restarted.
* Garbage collector sometimes keep the legacy containers for a long time if there aren't too many containers on the node. In that case, dockershim will keep performing extra `docker ps` which introduces overhead.
* Manually remove all legacy containers will fix this.
* Should we garbage collect legacy containers/sandboxes in dockershim by ourselves? /cc @yujuhong
* Host port will not be reclaimed for the lack of checkpoint for legacy sandboxes. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39903 /cc @freehan
/cc @yujuhong @feiskyer @dchen1107 @kubernetes/sig-node-api-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
We should mention the caveats of in-place upgrade in release note.
```