91e37eeb92
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67766, 67642, 67772). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>. Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits **What this PR does / why we need it**: Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits, This is an azure cloud provider implementation related to feature: [Dynamic Maximum volume count](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/554) **Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*: Fixes #66269 **Special notes for your reviewer**: This PR use `az.VirtualMachineSizesClient.List` to list all vm sizes under region, match vm size with current node size, and then got `MaxDataDiskCount`, the `GetVolumeLimits` happens in kubelet and will return `attachable-volumes-azure-disk` in node status as following example: ``` agentpool-22082114-0 ... allocatable: attachable-volumes-azure-disk: "8" cpu: "2" ephemeral-storage: "28043041951" hugepages-1Gi: "0" hugepages-2Mi: "0" memory: 7034772Ki pods: "30" ``` **Release note**: ``` Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits ``` /sig azure /kind feature |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| providers | ||
| BUILD | ||
| cloud.go | ||
| doc.go | ||
| OWNERS | ||
| plugins.go | ||
| README.md | ||
Deprecation Notice: This directory has entered maintenance mode and will not be accepting new providers. Cloud Providers in this directory will continue to be actively developed or maintained and supported at their current level of support as a longer-term solution evolves.
Overview:
The mechanism for supporting cloud providers is currently in transition: the original method of implementing cloud provider-specific functionality within the main kubernetes tree (here) is no longer advised; however, the proposed solution is still in development.
Guidance for potential cloud providers:
- Support for cloud providers is currently in a state of flux. Background information on motivation and the proposal for improving is in the github proposal.
- In support of this plan, a new cloud-controller-manager binary was added in 1.6. This was the first of several steps (see the proposal for more information).
- Attempts to contribute new cloud providers or (to a lesser extent) persistent volumes to the core repo will likely meet with some pushback from reviewers/approvers.
- It is understood that this is an unfortunate situation in which 'the old way is no longer supported but the new way is not ready yet', but the initial path is unsustainable, and contributors are encouraged to participate in the implementation of the proposed long-term solution, as there is risk that PRs for new cloud providers here will not be approved.
- Though the fully productized support envisioned in the proposal is still 2 - 3 releases out, the foundational work is underway, and a motivated cloud provider could accomplish the work in a forward-looking way. Contributors are encouraged to assist with the implementation of the design outlined in the proposal.
Some additional context on status / direction:
- 1.6 added a new cloud-controller-manager binary that may be used for testing the new out-of-core cloudprovider flow.
- Setting cloud-provider=external allows for creation of a separate controller-manager binary
- 1.7 adds extensible admission control, further enabling topology customization.