kubernetes/pkg/api/resource/scale_int_test.go
Xiang Li cf82d6b004 resource: optimize scale function
The original scale function takes around 800ns/op with more
than 10 allocations. It significantly slow down scheduler
and other components that heavily relys on resource pkg.
For more information see #18126.

This pull request tries to optimize scale function. It takes
two approach:

1. when the value is small, only use normal math ops.
2. when the value is large, use math.Big with buffer pool.

The final result is:

BenchmarkScaledValueSmall-4	20000000	        66.9 ns/op	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkScaledValueLarge-4	 2000000	       711 ns/op	      48 B/op	       1 allocs/op

I also run the scheduler benchmark again. It doubles the throughput of
scheduler for 1000 nodes case.
2015-12-03 17:00:13 -08:00

86 lines
2.1 KiB
Go

/*
Copyright 2015 The Kubernetes Authors All rights reserved.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/
package resource
import (
"math"
"math/big"
"testing"
)
func TestScaledValue(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
unscaled *big.Int
scale int
newScale int
want int64
}{
// remain scale
{big.NewInt(1000), 0, 0, 1000},
// scale down
{big.NewInt(1000), 0, -3, 1},
{big.NewInt(1000), 3, 0, 1},
{big.NewInt(0), 3, 0, 0},
// always round up
{big.NewInt(999), 3, 0, 1},
{big.NewInt(500), 3, 0, 1},
{big.NewInt(499), 3, 0, 1},
{big.NewInt(1), 3, 0, 1},
// large scaled value does not lose precision
{big.NewInt(0).Sub(maxInt64, bigOne), 1, 0, (math.MaxInt64-1)/10 + 1},
// large intermidiate result.
{big.NewInt(1).Exp(big.NewInt(10), big.NewInt(100), nil), 100, 0, 1},
// scale up
{big.NewInt(0), 0, 3, 0},
{big.NewInt(1), 0, 3, 1000},
{big.NewInt(1), -3, 0, 1000},
{big.NewInt(1000), -3, 2, 100000000},
{big.NewInt(0).Div(big.NewInt(math.MaxInt64), bigThousand), 0, 3,
(math.MaxInt64 / 1000) * 1000},
}
for i, tt := range tests {
old := (&big.Int{}).Set(tt.unscaled)
got := scaledValue(tt.unscaled, tt.scale, tt.newScale)
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("#%d: got = %v, want %v", i, got, tt.want)
}
if tt.unscaled.Cmp(old) != 0 {
t.Errorf("#%d: unscaled = %v, want %v", i, tt.unscaled, old)
}
}
}
func BenchmarkScaledValueSmall(b *testing.B) {
s := big.NewInt(1000)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
scaledValue(s, 3, 0)
}
}
func BenchmarkScaledValueLarge(b *testing.B) {
s := big.NewInt(math.MaxInt64)
s.Mul(s, big.NewInt(1000))
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
scaledValue(s, 10, 0)
}
}