kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/internal/junit/junit.go
Patrick Ohly 617f2132fe e2e: avoid redundant labels in JUnit file
Because labels are currently typically added also to the spec texts, we don't
need to write them separately.

This redundancy got introduced in f2cfbf44b1 when registering all inline tags
also as labels.
2023-11-13 08:08:09 +01:00

47 lines
1.7 KiB
Go

/*
Copyright 2022 The Kubernetes Authors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/
package junit
import (
"github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2"
"github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/reporters"
"github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/types"
)
// WriteJUnitReport generates a JUnit file that is shorter than the one
// normally written by `ginkgo --junit-report`. This is needed because the full
// report can become too large for tools like Spyglass
// (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/111510).
func WriteJUnitReport(report ginkgo.Report, filename string) error {
config := reporters.JunitReportConfig{
// Remove details for specs where we don't care.
OmitTimelinesForSpecState: types.SpecStatePassed | types.SpecStateSkipped,
// Don't write <failure message="summary">. The same text is
// also in the full text for the failure. If we were to write
// both, then tools like kettle and spyglass would concatenate
// the two strings and thus show duplicated information.
OmitFailureMessageAttr: true,
// All labels are also part of the spec texts in inline [] tags,
// so we don't need to write them separately.
OmitSpecLabels: true,
}
return reporters.GenerateJUnitReportWithConfig(report, filename, config)
}