Right now alock assumes that number of locks taken will equal number of
core lines. This is not the case in pio, where only parts of metadata
are under locks. If pio request overlaps locked and not-locked metadata
section it will have different core lines number and awaited locks
number. To remedy this discrepancy additional method which gets count of
locks that will be taken/waited on is added to alock API.
Signed-off-by: Jan Musial <jan.musial@intel.com>
It's required, because environments other than Linux kernel may not define
their own DIV_ROUND_UP. Moving it to env would just generate boilerplate,
because its implementation is trivial and portable.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
This allows to avoid allocating cleaner metadata section and effectively
save up to 20% of metadata memory footprint.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
Since the threshold for the first bucket is always zero and the condition to
exit from the loop is never met in the first iteration it is save to start
iterating from `1`
This change is meant to avoid confusing static code analyzers
Signed-off-by: Michal Mielewczyk <michal.mielewczyk@intel.com>
Those names are used for creating allocators. In Linux kernel environment
starting from version 5.12 there is a kernel warning if allocator name
contains spaces. This patch resolves this problem by replacing spaces with
underscores.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
Cleaning policy is initialized on standby activate, after all the metadata
from primary cache is flushed and the actual recovery is being performed.
Thus initializing it earlier on standby attach is incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
conf_meta->core_count is not modified during load/recovery in the latest
version. Thus in case of error in cores initialization, in order to
iterate over the initialized cores we must depend on core->added only,
regardles of conf_meta->core_count value. for_each_core() macro does
exactly this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Rutkowski <adam.j.rutkowski@intel.com>
Fix error code for superblock checksum mismatch.
Superblock validation now returns a proper error on checksum check fail.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz <krzysztof.majzerowicz-jaszcz@intel.com>
Set bit only on core addition and clean it on core removal.
This allows to avoid conf metadata modification in load / standby load
paths, which effectively prevents issues with metadata mismatch during
consequent standby activate attempts after initial activate failure.
Previously the first attempt changed the metadata, so on comparison with
metadata on drive failed on any following attempt, leading to inability
to activate the cache.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
First try to clean only the mapping. This operation does not require any
rollback, so even if flushing collision fails, core object is still
intact. In case of error we inform user that core was not removed by
returning new error code (-OCF_ERR_CORE_NOT_REMOVED).
After flushing collision succeeds we remove core from metadata and
flush superblock at the end. At that point the core is fully removed
from OCF and even if superblock flush error occurs there is nothing we
can do about it, so we just return the error code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
This function must be fixed to work with metadata flapping. Until then
mark as not supported
Signed-off-by: Adam Rutkowski <adam.j.rutkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz <krzysztof.majzerowicz-jaszcz@intel.com>
Superblock can be used during load of other sections, so we need to check
its CRC before other sections are loaded.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Majzerowicz-Jaszcz <krzysztof.majzerowicz-jaszcz@intel.com>
So far the only resource protected by backfill queue blocking was internal
OCF request queue. Move unblock to backfill io completion to protect also
queue of underlying cache device.
Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <robert.baldyga@intel.com>
