- split the xtask crate into structured modules for
- bindings
- ci
- dev
- util
- no-std
- Adding commands for
- ci-release/ci-debug
- MUSL/no-std
- per- binding language smoke tests
- developer tasks (fmt, clippy, pre-commit, pre-push)
- refresh Cargo manifests/locks, binding readmes, and shared FFI helpers so every binding reuses the same preparation steps
- refactor GitHub Actions (release/debug, extensions, CodeQL, clippy, bindings) to call the new xtask commands
- Use rust-cache in ci workflows (microsoft qdk also does this)
- extend README with a contributor workflow section describing how xtask mirrors CI expectations
- update pre-commit and pre-push hooks to use the xtask dev commands
WORKAROUND:
When dotnet is run from an xtask, codeql tracer intercepts it an routes to a nonexistent binary.
Therefore in codeql workflow, xtask is not used for c# and instead dotnet is directly invoked.
Tracked by #545closes#475
Signed-off-by: Anand Krishnamoorthi <anakrish@microsoft.com>
Policy evaluation at scale needs to be able to set memory limits
so that a bad policy does not hog memory or to ensure that
policy evaluation itself does not use too much memory which could
cause other components to suffer.
This PR introduces capability to set and enforce global memory limits.
It also lays the groundwork for enabling per evaluation limits in future.
Once a global memory limit is set, Regorus maintains per thread counters
to track memory activity (allocation, deallocation) of a thread.
These counters are periodically flushed to global memory counters.
Per thread counters avoid the contention that updating global counters
on each alloc/free would cause.
Policy evaluation periodically checks these counters and raises errors
if allocated memory has exceeded the configured limit.
Currently memory limit capability is exposed only to FFI and C#.
Also update mimalloc to v2.2.6
Signed-off-by: Anand Krishnamoorthi <anakrish@microsoft.com>
Anand Krishnamoorthi