Merge pull request #1748 from crosbymichael/bdfl
Remove BDFL in favor of TSC
This commit is contained in:
commit
c2ab5564b3
101
MAINTAINERS
101
MAINTAINERS
@ -50,10 +50,9 @@ maintainer candidates are selected and proposed on the maintainers mailing list.
|
||||
|
||||
After a candidate has been announced on the maintainers mailing list, the
|
||||
existing maintainers are given five business days to discuss the candidate,
|
||||
raise objections and cast their vote. Candidates must be approved by the BDFL
|
||||
and at least 66% of the current maintainers by adding their vote on the mailing
|
||||
raise objections and cast their vote. Candidates must be approved by at least 66% of the current maintainers by adding their vote on the mailing
|
||||
list. Only maintainers of the repository that the candidate is proposed for are
|
||||
allowed to vote. The BDFL's vote is mandatory.
|
||||
allowed to vote.
|
||||
|
||||
If a candidate is approved, a maintainer will contact the candidate to invite
|
||||
the candidate to open a pull request that adds the contributor to the
|
||||
@ -108,43 +107,12 @@ a maintainer. If the maintainer decides to step down as a maintainer, they
|
||||
open a pull request to be removed from the MAINTAINERS file.
|
||||
|
||||
If the maintainer wants to remain a maintainer, but is unable to perform the
|
||||
required duties they can be removed with a vote by the BDFL and at least 66% of
|
||||
the current maintainers. The BDFL's vote is mandatory. An e-mail is sent to the
|
||||
required duties they can be removed with a vote of at least 66% of
|
||||
the current maintainers. An e-mail is sent to the
|
||||
mailing list, inviting maintainers of the project to vote. The voting period is
|
||||
five business days. Issues related to a maintainer's performance should be
|
||||
discussed with them among the other maintainers so that they are not surprised
|
||||
by a pull request removing them.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
[Rules.bdfl]
|
||||
|
||||
title = "The Benevolent dictator for life (BDFL)"
|
||||
|
||||
text = """
|
||||
containerd follows the timeless, highly efficient and totally unfair system
|
||||
known as [Benevolent dictator for
|
||||
life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_Dictator_for_Life), with yours
|
||||
truly, Solomon Hykes, in the role of BDFL. This means that all decisions are
|
||||
made, by default, by Solomon. Since making every decision himself would be
|
||||
highly un-scalable, in practice decisions are spread across multiple
|
||||
maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
Ideally, the BDFL role is like the Queen of England: awesome crown, but not an
|
||||
actual operational role day-to-day. The real job of a BDFL is to NEVER GO AWAY.
|
||||
Every other rule can change, perhaps drastically so, but the BDFL will always be
|
||||
there, preserving the philosophy and principles of the project, and keeping
|
||||
ultimate authority over its fate. This gives us great flexibility in
|
||||
experimenting with various governance models, knowing that we can always press
|
||||
the "reset" button without fear of fragmentation or deadlock. See the US
|
||||
congress for a counter-example.
|
||||
|
||||
BDFL daily routine:
|
||||
|
||||
* Is the project governance stuck in a deadlock or irreversibly fragmented?
|
||||
* If yes: refactor the project governance
|
||||
* Are there issues or conflicts escalated by maintainers?
|
||||
* If yes: resolve them
|
||||
* Go back to polishing that crown.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
[Rules.decisions]
|
||||
@ -205,58 +173,35 @@ Yes. Nobody should ever push to master directly. All changes should be
|
||||
made through a pull request.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
[Rules.tsc]
|
||||
|
||||
title = "Conflict Resolution and technical disputes"
|
||||
|
||||
text = """
|
||||
containerd defers to the [Technical Steering Committee](https://github.com/moby/tsc) for escalations and resolution on disputes for technical matters."
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
[Rules.meta]
|
||||
|
||||
title = "How is this process changed?"
|
||||
|
||||
text = "Just like everything else: by making a pull request :)"
|
||||
|
||||
# Current project roles
|
||||
[Roles]
|
||||
|
||||
[Roles.bdfl]
|
||||
|
||||
person = "shykes"
|
||||
|
||||
[Roles."Chief Architect"]
|
||||
|
||||
person = "crosbymichael"
|
||||
|
||||
text = """
|
||||
The chief architect is responsible for the overall integrity of the technical
|
||||
architecture across all subsystems, and the consistency of APIs and UI.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes to UI, public APIs and overall architecture must be approved by the
|
||||
chief architect.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
[Roles."Chief Maintainer"]
|
||||
|
||||
person = "crosbymichael"
|
||||
|
||||
text = """
|
||||
The chief maintainer is responsible for all aspects of quality for the project
|
||||
including code reviews, usability, stability, security, performance, etc. The
|
||||
most important function of the chief maintainer is to lead by example. On the
|
||||
first day of a new maintainer, the best advice should be "follow the C.M.'s
|
||||
example and you'll be fine".
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
# Current project organization
|
||||
[Org]
|
||||
|
||||
[Org.Maintainers]
|
||||
people = [
|
||||
"akihirosuda",
|
||||
"crosbymichael",
|
||||
"dqminh",
|
||||
"dmcgowan",
|
||||
"estesp",
|
||||
"hqhq",
|
||||
"jhowardmsft",
|
||||
"mlaventure",
|
||||
"stevvooe",
|
||||
]
|
||||
people = [
|
||||
"akihirosuda",
|
||||
"crosbymichael",
|
||||
"dqminh",
|
||||
"dmcgowan",
|
||||
"estesp",
|
||||
"hqhq",
|
||||
"jhowardmsft",
|
||||
"mlaventure",
|
||||
"stevvooe",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[People]
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user