Avoid undesirable allocation when device is associated with multiple NUMA Nodes
suppose there are two devices dev1 and dev2, each has NUMA Nodes associated as below: dev1: numa1 dev2: numa1, numa2 and we request a device from numa2, currently filterByAffinity() will return [], [dev1, dev2], [] if loop of available devices produce a sequence of [dev1, dev2], that is is not desirable as what we truely expect is an allocation of dev2 from numa2.
This commit is contained in:
parent
04b7977ef6
commit
2ef1f81076
@ -791,9 +791,23 @@ func (m *ManagerImpl) filterByAffinity(podUID, contName, resource string, availa
|
||||
nodes = append(nodes, node)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort the list of nodes by how many devices they contain.
|
||||
// Sort the list of nodes by nodes from affinity set, nodes from none-affinity
|
||||
// set, nodes without topology set and how many devices they contain.
|
||||
sort.Slice(nodes, func(i, j int) bool {
|
||||
return perNodeDevices[i].Len() < perNodeDevices[j].Len()
|
||||
ni, nj := nodes[i], nodes[j]
|
||||
// 1. node[i] from to affninity set
|
||||
if hint.NUMANodeAffinity.IsSet(ni) {
|
||||
return !hint.NUMANodeAffinity.IsSet(nj) || perNodeDevices[ni].Len() < perNodeDevices[nj].Len()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 2. node[i] from none-affinity set
|
||||
if ni != nodeWithoutTopology {
|
||||
return !hint.NUMANodeAffinity.IsSet(nj) &&
|
||||
(nj == nodeWithoutTopology || perNodeDevices[ni].Len() < perNodeDevices[nj].Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 3. node[i] from node without topology set
|
||||
return nj == nodeWithoutTopology && perNodeDevices[ni].Len() < perNodeDevices[nj].Len()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate three sorted lists of devices. Devices in the first list come
|
||||
|
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/checkpointmanager"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/devicemanager/checkpoint"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/cm/topologymanager/bitmask"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/config"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/lifecycle"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/pluginmanager"
|
||||
@ -669,6 +670,106 @@ type TestResource struct {
|
||||
topology bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestFilterByAffinity(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
as := require.New(t)
|
||||
allDevices := ResourceDeviceInstances{
|
||||
"res1": map[string]pluginapi.Device{
|
||||
"dev1": {
|
||||
ID: "dev1",
|
||||
Topology: &pluginapi.TopologyInfo{
|
||||
Nodes: []*pluginapi.NUMANode{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dev2": {
|
||||
ID: "dev2",
|
||||
Topology: &pluginapi.TopologyInfo{
|
||||
Nodes: []*pluginapi.NUMANode{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dev3": {
|
||||
ID: "dev3",
|
||||
Topology: &pluginapi.TopologyInfo{
|
||||
Nodes: []*pluginapi.NUMANode{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
"dev4": {
|
||||
ID: "dev4",
|
||||
Topology: &pluginapi.TopologyInfo{
|
||||
Nodes: []*pluginapi.NUMANode{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: 2,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
testManager := ManagerImpl{
|
||||
topologyAffinityStore: newFakeTopologyManager(),
|
||||
allDevices: allDevices,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
testCases := []struct {
|
||||
available sets.String
|
||||
fromAffinityExpected sets.String
|
||||
notFromAffinityExpected sets.String
|
||||
withoutTopologyExpected sets.String
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
available: sets.NewString("dev1", "dev2"),
|
||||
fromAffinityExpected: sets.NewString("dev2"),
|
||||
notFromAffinityExpected: sets.NewString("dev1"),
|
||||
withoutTopologyExpected: sets.NewString(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
available: sets.NewString("dev1", "dev2", "dev3", "dev4"),
|
||||
fromAffinityExpected: sets.NewString("dev2", "dev3", "dev4"),
|
||||
notFromAffinityExpected: sets.NewString("dev1"),
|
||||
withoutTopologyExpected: sets.NewString(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, testCase := range testCases {
|
||||
fromAffinity, notFromAffinity, withoutTopology := testManager.filterByAffinity("", "", "res1", testCase.available)
|
||||
as.Truef(fromAffinity.Equal(testCase.fromAffinityExpected), "expect devices from affinity to be %v but got %v", testCase.fromAffinityExpected, fromAffinity)
|
||||
as.Truef(notFromAffinity.Equal(testCase.notFromAffinityExpected), "expect devices not from affinity to be %v but got %v", testCase.notFromAffinityExpected, notFromAffinity)
|
||||
as.Truef(withoutTopology.Equal(testCase.withoutTopologyExpected), "expect devices without topology to be %v but got %v", testCase.notFromAffinityExpected, notFromAffinity)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type fakeTopologyManager struct {
|
||||
topologymanager.Manager
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newFakeTopologyManager() topologymanager.Manager {
|
||||
return &fakeTopologyManager{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (m *fakeTopologyManager) GetAffinity(podUID string, containerName string) topologymanager.TopologyHint {
|
||||
// return hint with numa2 set
|
||||
affinity, _ := bitmask.NewBitMask(2)
|
||||
return topologymanager.TopologyHint{
|
||||
NUMANodeAffinity: affinity,
|
||||
Preferred: true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestPodContainerDeviceAllocation(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
res1 := TestResource{
|
||||
resourceName: "domain1.com/resource1",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user