Automatic merge from submit-queue
Deflake TestSyncDeploymentDeletionRace
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The cache was sometimes catching up while we were testing the case
where the cache is not yet caught up.
Before this fix, I could reproduce the failure with the following
command. After the fix, it passes.
```
go test -count 100000 -run TestSyncDeploymentDeletionRace
```
I checked the other controllers, and they all were already not starting informers for the deletion race test. I also checked that the deletion race tests for other controllers all pass with `-count 100000`.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#43390
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
The cache was sometimes catching up while we were testing the case
where the cache is not yet caught up.
Before this fix, I could reproduce the failure with the following
command. After the fix, it passes.
```
go test -count 100000 -run TestSyncDeploymentDeletionRace
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
GC: Fix re-adoption race when orphaning dependents.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The GC expects that once it sees a controller with a non-nil
DeletionTimestamp, that controller will not attempt any adoption.
There was a known race condition that could cause a controller to
re-adopt something orphaned by the GC, because the controller is using a
cached value of its own spec from before DeletionTimestamp was set.
This fixes that race by doing an uncached quorum read of the controller
spec just before the first adoption attempt. It's important that this
read occurs after listing potential orphans. Note that this uncached
read is skipped if no adoptions are attempted (i.e. at steady state).
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#42639
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
The GC expects that once it sees a controller with a non-nil
DeletionTimestamp, that controller will not attempt any adoption.
There was a known race condition that could cause a controller to
re-adopt something orphaned by the GC, because the controller is using a
cached value of its own spec from before DeletionTimestamp was set.
This fixes that race by doing an uncached quorum read of the controller
spec just before the first adoption attempt. It's important that this
read occurs after listing potential orphans. Note that this uncached
read is skipped if no adoptions are attempted (i.e. at steady state).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubectl: Use v1.5-compatible ownership logic when listing dependents.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This restores compatibility between kubectl 1.6 and clusters running Kubernetes 1.5.x. It introduces transitional ownership logic in which the client considers ControllerRef when it exists, but does not require it to exist.
If we were to ignore ControllerRef altogether (pre-1.6 client behavior), we would introduce a new failure mode in v1.6 because controllers that used to get stuck due to selector overlap will now make progress. For example, that means when reaping ReplicaSets of an overlapping Deployment, we would risk deleting ReplicaSets belonging to a different Deployment that we aren't about to delete.
This transitional logic avoids such surprises in 1.6 clusters, and does no worse than kubectl 1.5 did in 1.5 clusters. To prevent this when kubectl 1.5 is used against 1.6 clusters, we can cherrypick this change.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#43159
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix revision when SetDeploymentRevision
When some oldRSs be deleted or cleared(eg. revisionHistoryLimit set 0), the revision for SetDeploymentRevision is incorrect
In particular, we should not assume ControllerRefs are necessarily set.
However, we can still use ControllerRefs that do exist to avoid
interfering with controllers that do use it.
This effectively reverts the client-side changes in
cec3899b96.
We have to maintain the old behavior on the client side to support
version skew when talking to old servers that set the annotation.
However, the new server-side behavior is still to NOT set the
annotation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix Deployment upgrade test.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When the upgrade test operates on Deployments in a pre-1.6 cluster (i.e. during the Setup phase), it needs to use the v1.5 deployment/util logic. In particular, the v1.5 logic does not filter children to only those with a matching ControllerRef.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#42738
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
When the upgrade test operates on Deployments in a pre-1.6 cluster
(i.e. during the Setup phase), it needs to use the v1.5 deployment/util
logic. In particular, the v1.5 logic does not filter children to only
those with a matching ControllerRef.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix taint based pod eviction for clusters where controller manager is not running with allocate-node-cidrs set
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42733
In my cluster, I have not set allocate-node-cidr, and It is causing taint based pod eviction to fail.
@gmarek @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-bugs @davidopp @derekwaynecarr
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38805, 42362, 42862)
Let GC print specific message for RESTMapping failure
Make the error messages reported in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39816 to be more specific, also only print the message once.
I'll also update the garbage collector's doc to clearly state we don't support tpr yet.
We'll wait for the watchable discovery feature (@sttts are you going to work on that?) to land in 1.7, and then enable the garbage collector to handle TPR.
cc @hongchaodeng @MikaelCluseau @djMax
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42024, 42780, 42808, 42640)
kubectl: respect DaemonSet strategy parameters for rollout status
It handles "after-merge" comments from #41116
cc @kargakis @janetkuo
I will add one more e2e test later. I need to handle some in company stuff.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42024, 42780, 42808, 42640)
Node controller test flake 39975 with delay for try function
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#39975
/cc @ncdc @gmarek @liggitt
The design of DaemonSet requires a relist before each phase (manage,
update, status) because it does not short-circuit and requeue for each
action triggered.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41890, 42593, 42633, 42626, 42609)
Remove everything that is not new from batch/v2alpha1
Fixes#37166.
@lavalamp you've asked for it
@erictune this is a prereq for moving CronJobs to beta. I initially planned to put all in one PR, but after I did that I figured out it'll be easier to review separately. ptal
@kubernetes/api-approvers @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42506, 42585, 42596, 42584)
RC/RS: Fix ignoring inactive Pods.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix typo that broke ignoring of inactive Pods in RC, and add unit test for that case.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#37479
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
StatefulSet: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings StatefulSet into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#36859
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
StatefulSet now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods. At the time of upgrade, **you must not have StatefulSets with selectors that overlap** with any other controllers (such as ReplicaSets), or else [ownership of Pods may change](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md#upgrading).
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Deployment should ignore Pods that don't match the selector, even if
they have a ControllerRef pointing to one of the ReplicaSets it owns.
The ReplicaSet itself will orphan the Pod as soon as it syncs.
