If pods get stuck, then giving the name of one makes it possible
to search for it in the log output. Without the name it's hard
to figure out which pods got stuck.
Because the JSON file gets written at the end of the top-level benchmark, all
data items had `BenchmarkPerfScheduling/` as prefix in the `Name` label. This
is redundant and makes it harder to see the actual name. Now that common prefix
gets removed.
This runs workloads that are labeled as "integration-test". The apiserver and
scheduler are only started once per unique configuration, followed by each
workload using that configuration. This makes execution faster. In contrast to
benchmarking, we care less about starting with a clean slate for each test.
Merely deleting the namespace is not enough:
- Workloads might rely on the garbage collector to get rid of obsolete objects,
so we should run it to be on the safe side.
- Pods must be force-deleted because kubelet is not running.
- Finally, the namespace controller is needed to get rid of
deleted namespaces.
Each benchmark test case runs with a fresh etcd instance. Therefore it is not
necessary to delete objects after a run.
A future unit test might reuse etcd, therefore cleanup is optional.
This is required because an empty name is no longer supported: the
perf-dashboard is run with --allow-parsers-matching-all-tests=false with causes
perfdash to skip current configuration for BenchmarkPerfResults as it does not
have name
set (4674704f45/perfdash/metrics-downloader.go (L165-L167)).
The perf-dash config needs to be updated accordingly.
The goal is to only label workloads as "performance" which actually run long
enough to provide useful metrics. The throughput collector samples once per
second, so a workload should run at least 5, better 10 seconds to get at least
a minimal amount of samples for the percentile calculation.
For benchstat analysis of runs with sufficient repetitions to get statistically
meaningful results, each workload shouldn't run more than one minute, otherwise
before/after analysis becomes too slow.
The labels were chosen based on benchmark runs on a reasonably fast desktop. To
know how long each workload takes, a new "runtime_seconds" benchmark result
gets added.
The default scheduler configuration must be based on the v1 API where the
plugin is enabled by default. Then if (and only if) the
DynamicResourceAllocation feature gate for a test is set, the corresponding
API group also gets enabled.
The normal dynamic resource claim controller is started if needed to create
ResourceClaims from ResourceClaimTemplates.
Without the upcoming optimizations in the scheduler, scheduling with dynamic
resources is fairly slow. The new test cases take around 15 minutes wall clock
time on my desktop.
This will change when adding dynamic resource allocation test cases. Instead of
changing mustSetupScheduler and StartScheduler for that, let's return the
informer factory and create informers as needed in the test.
Entire test cases and workloads can have labels attached to them. The union of
these must match the label filter which works as in GitHub. The benchmark by
default runs the tests that are labeled "performance", which is the same as
before.
The previous solution had some shortcomings:
- It was based on the assumption that the goroutine gets woken up at regular
intervals. This is not actually guaranteed. Now the code keeps track of the
actual start and end of an interval and verifies that assumption.
- If no pod was scheduled (unlikely, but could happen), then
"0 pods/s" got recorded. In such a case, the metric was always either
zero or >= 1. A better solution is to extend the interval
until some pod gets scheduled. With the larger time interval
it is then possible to also track, for example, 0.5 pods/s.
It makes sense to define a test where, depending on the parameters, some
operation creations zero pods, namespaces or nodes. The validation didn't allow
that previously due to the way how it was implemented although the underlying
code works fine with zero as count.
collector.collect got called without ensuring that collector.run had
terminated, so it could have happened that collector.run adds another sample
while collector.collect is reading them.
This replaces the pretty useless us/op metric (useless because it includes
setup and teardown times) with the same values that also get stored in the JSON
file.
The main advantage is that benchstat can be used to analyze and compare
results.
All code must use the context from Ginkgo when doing API calls or polling for a
change, otherwise the code would not return immediately when the test gets
aborted.
- Run hack/update-codegen.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-device-plugin.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-protobuf.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-runtime.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh
- Run hack/update-openapi-spec.sh
- Run hack/update-gofmt.sh
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
