Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66094, 65676). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Safe encode template hash value to make it consistent with resource name
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66093
**Special notes for your reviewer**: It's safe to change the function that generates template hash label, because this value is only used when creating a resource and never updated or compared. Therefore, it won't break existing workloads after k8s upgrade/downgrade. Note that we've changed hash before when introducing hash collision avoidance mechanism.
@kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66136, 64999, 65425, 66120, 66074). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
optimize certificate cleaner
No need to parse certificates for every conditions
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65052, 65594). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix update node condition
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65051
/area cloudprovider
/sig cluster-lifecycle
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66076, 65792, 65649). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
kubernetes: fix printf format errors
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
```release-note
NONE
```
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
remove create-on-update logic for quota controller
review: add more error check
remove unused args
revert changes in patch.go
use hasUID to judge if it's a create-on-update
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64226, 65880). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Populate NodeAffinity on top of labels for cloud based PersistentVolumes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR populates the NodeAffinity field (on top of the existing labels) for PVs backed by cloud providers like EC2 EBS and GCE PD.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63232
Sample `describe pv` output for EBS with node affinity field populated:
```
kubectl describe pv pv0001
Name: pv0001
Labels: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=us-west-2
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=us-west-2a
Annotations: <none>
Finalizers: [kubernetes.io/pv-protection]
StorageClass:
Status: Available
Claim:
Reclaim Policy: Retain
Access Modes: RWO
Capacity: 5Gi
Node Affinity:
Required Terms:
Term 0: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [us-west-2a]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [us-west-2]
Message:
Source:
Type: AWSElasticBlockStore (a Persistent Disk resource in AWS)
VolumeID: vol-00cf03a068c62cbe6
FSType: ext4
Partition: 0
ReadOnly: false
Events: <none>
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42
**Release note**:
```NONE```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65677, 65711, 65150, 65726). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improved logging message for checking if node is shutdown.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The previous error message was "Error getting data for node" which was too broad of a message and not very descriptive. This PR will update it to "Error checking if node is shutdown" so that it is more specific.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add lichuqiang as reviewer of persistentvolume controller (for volume scheduling)
Now that I've been working on the storage topology-aware feature for quite a time. Really hope that I can help do some review.
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64741, 65484). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fixes docs mismatched with implementation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Some document is far different with the implementation, which is really confusing.
Manually fixed them and appended more information.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix out of bounds error on non-64-bit machines
This fixes an out of bounds error when running the controllers on a 32-bit machine
```
W0628 17:52:30.171975 1 node_lifecycle_controller.go:782] Missing timestamp for Node kube-master. Assuming now as a timestamp.
I0628 17:52:30.172115 1 taint_manager.go:205] Starting NoExecuteTaintManager
panic: runtime error: index out of range
goroutine 1740 [running]:
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/controller/nodelifecycle/scheduler.(*NoExecuteTaintManager).Run.func1(0x165e6000, 0x8, 0x15984100)
/workspace/anago-v1.11.0-rc.3.3+91e7b4fd31fcd3/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/controller/nodelifecycle/scheduler/taint_manager.go:229 +0x1f8
created by k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/controller/nodelifecycle/scheduler.(*NoExecuteTaintManager).Run
/workspace/anago-v1.11.0-rc.3.3+91e7b4fd31fcd3/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/controller/nodelifecycle/scheduler/taint_manager.go:217 +0x27c
```
See https://play.golang.org/p/rIpicHGHtiT for an example of the coercion overflow
/assign @wojtek-t
/kind bug
```release-note
fixes an out of range panic in the NoExecuteTaintManager controller when running a non-64-bit build
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65032, 63471, 64104, 64672, 64427). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Make taint behavior consistent for NoSchedule
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make taint behavior consistent.
If `TaintNodesByCondition ` is enable, taint node with `NotReady:NoSchedule`.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63420
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63580, 63744, 64541, 64502, 64100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
we should use Warningf instead of Warning when we are using format string
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
we should use Warningf instead of Warning when we are using format string
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63580, 63744, 64541, 64502, 64100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove redundant getKey functions from controller tests
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Volunteer to maintain nodelifecycle
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
/cc @gmarek @bowei :)
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
volume: decrease memory allocations for debugging messages
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
<img width="1769" alt="screen shot 2018-06-11 at 13 15 31" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44136/41230128-ebf7233c-6d7e-11e8-899d-6251a5fde236.png">
On large clusters, where the glog is not running on V(5) using the format as: `glog.V(5).Infof(fmt.Sprintf(....))` will cause the code inside `Infof()` to be ran and generate a tons of memory allocations even if the output of those messages are not returned to the console...
This patch should reduce those calls and also the string allocations done by message generation.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
improve memory footprint of daemonset simulate
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is an alternative for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64915 (it might be not needed if that PR will merge)
During memory profiling of OpenShift, we noticed a significant amount of object allocations done by `IsControlledBy()`. @sttts found that the `GetObjectReferences()` method is doing a deep-copy of the object references.
This PR simplify the `IsControlledBy()` to just iterate over the ownerRefs, without copying them.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63386, 64624, 62297, 64847). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Let the garbage collector use json merge patch when SMP is not supported
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Let garbage collector fallback to use json merge patch when strategic merge patch returns 415. This enables orphan delete on custom resources.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56348
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR is developed based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56595. Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56606 for more information.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Orphan delete is now supported for custom resources
```
/sig api-machinery
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64749, 64797). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Handle deleted DaemonSet properly
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
After kubectl reapers are removed (#63979) and foreground deletion are used, DaemonSet controller may race with garbage collector when it tries to update DaemonSet status of the DaemonSet being deleted.
Here's what happened:
1. Someone/something performs a foreground deletion on a DaemonSet
1. DaemonSet finalizer and DeletionTimestamp are both set
1. DaemonSet history objects (ControllerRevisions) and pods are being deleted by garbage collector; meanwhile, DaemonSet controller tries to update DaemonSet status.
* Updating DaemonSet status requires constructing DaemonSet history objects, to figure out current revision and which pods do/don't belong to current revision
1. When updating DaemonSet status, DaemonSet controller tries to create a DaemonSet history object that matches current DaemonSet spec
1. Garbage collector then tries to delete that DaemonSet history object. And repeat.
Because we can't make DaemonSet pods be deleted before DaemonSet history objects (DaemonSet history objects don't own DaemonSet pods!), we cannot reliably calculate DaemonSet status without history objects anyways. Therefore, we don't update DaemonSet status for DaemonSet being deleted.
Note that the reason why the kubectl delete hack works is because it forces DaemonSet pods to be removed before history objects.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#64313
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64009, 64780, 64354, 64727, 63650). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Never clean backoff in job controller
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/60985 I've added a mechanism which allows immediate job status update, unfortunately that broke the backoff logic seriously. I'm sorry for that. I've changed the `immediate` mechanism so that it NEVER cleans the backoff, but for the cases when we want fast status update it uses a zero backoff.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#62382
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @janetkuo
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Volume topology aware dynamic provisioning: work based on new API
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The PR has been split to 3 parts:
Part1: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63232 for basic scheduler and PV controller plumbing
Part2: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63233 for API change
and the PR itself includes work based on the API change:
- Dynamic provisioning allowed topologies scheduler work
- Update provisioning interface to be aware of selected node and topology
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Feature: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/561
Design: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/2168
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig storage
/sig scheduling
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane @saad-ali @bsalamat
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
Volume topology aware dynamic provisioning
```
