kube-proxy sets the sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
so NodePort services can be accessed on the loopback addresses in
IPv4, but this may present security issues.
Leverage the --nodeport-addresses flag to opt-out of this feature,
if the list is not empty and none of the IP ranges contains an IPv4
loopback address this sysctl is not set.
In addition, add a warning to inform users about this behavior.
Just check that the actual IP:port of the filtered endpoints is
correct; using DeepEqual requires us to copy all the extra endpoint
fields (eg, ZoneHints, IsLocal) from endpoints to expectedEndpoints,
which just makes the test cases unnecessarily bigger.
The "node local endpoints, hints are ignored" test was not actually
enabling topology correctly, so it would have gotten the expected
result even if the code was wrong. (Which, FTR, it wasn't.)
When nodePortAddresses is not specified for kube-proxy, it tried to open
the node port for a NodePort service twice, triggered by IPv4ZeroCIDR
and IPv6ZeroCIDR separately. The first attempt would succeed and the
second one would always generate an error log like below:
"listen tcp4 :30522: bind: address already in use"
This patch fixes it by ensuring nodeAddresses of a proxier only contain
the addresses for its IP family.
The same code appeared twice, once for the SVC chain and once for the
XLB chain, with the only difference being that the XLB version had
more verbose comments.
Also, in the NodePort code, fix it to properly take advantage of the
fact that GetNodeAddresses() guarantees that if it returns a
"match-all" CIDR, then it doesn't return anything else. That also
makes it unnecessary to loop over the node addresses twice.
If you pass just an IP address to "-s" or "-d", the iptables command
will fill in the correct mask automatically.
Originally, the proxier was just hardcoding "/32" for all of these,
which was unnecessary but simple. But when IPv6 support was added, the
code was made more complicated to deal with the fact that the "/32"
needed to be "/128" in the IPv6 case, so it would parse the IPs to
figure out which family they were, which in turn involved adding some
checks in case the parsing fails (even though that "can't happen" and
the old code didn't check for invalid IPs, even though that would
break the iptables-restore if there had been any).
Anyway, all of that is unnecessary because we can just pass the IP
strings to iptables directly rather than parsing and unparsing them
first.
(The diff to proxier_test.go is just deleting "/32" everywhere.)
If GetNodeAddresses() fails (eg, because you passed the wrong CIDR to
`--nodeport-addresses`), then any NodePort services would end up with
only half a set of iptables rules. Fix it to just not output the
NodePort-specific parts in that case (in addition to logging an error
about the GetNodeAddresses() failure).
The iptables and ipvs proxiers both had a check that none of the
elements of svcInfo.LoadBalancerIPStrings() were "", but that was
already guaranteed by the svcInfo code. Drop the unnecessary checks
and remove a level of indentation.
* Fix regression in kube-proxy
Don't use a prepend() - that allocates. Instead, make Write() take
either strings or slices (I wish we could express that better).
* WIP: switch to intf
* WIP: less appends
* tests and ipvs
The logic to detect stale endpoints was not assuming the endpoint
readiness.
We can have stale entries on UDP services for 2 reasons:
- an endpoint was receiving traffic and is removed or replaced
- a service was receiving traffic but not forwarding it, and starts
to forward it.
Add an e2e test to cover the regression
Filter the allEndpoints list into readyEndpoints sooner, and set
"hasEndpoints" based (mostly) on readyEndpoints, not allEndpoints (so
that, eg, we correctly generate REJECT rules for services with no
_functioning_ endpoints, even if they have unusable terminating
endpoints).
Also, write out the endpoint chains at the top of the loop when we
iterate the endpoints for the first time, rather than copying some of
the data to another set of variables and then writing them out later.
And don't write out endpoint chains that won't be used
Also, generate affinity rules only for readyEndpoints rather than
allEndpoints, so affinity gets broken correctly when an endpoint
becomes unready.
The external traffic policy terminating endpoints test was testing
LoadBalancer functionality against a NodePort service with no
nodePorts (or loadBalancer IPs). It managed to test what it wanted to
test, but it's kind of dubious (and we probably _shouldn't_ have been
generating the rules it was looking for since there was no way to
actually reach the XLB chains). So fix that.
Also make the terminating endpoints test use session affinity, to add
more testing for that. Also, remove the multiple copies of the same
identical Service that is used for all of the test cases in that test.
Also add a "Cluster traffic policy and no source ranges" test to
TestOverallIPTablesRulesWithMultipleServices since we weren't really
testing either of those.
Also add a test of --masquerade-all.
The test got broken to not actually use "no cluster CIDR" when
LocalDetector was implemented (and the old version of the unit test
didn't check enough to actually notice this).
The original tests here were very shy about looking at the iptables
output, and just relied on checks like "make sure there's a jump to
table X that also includes string Y somewhere in it" and stuff like
that. Whereas the newer tests were just like, "eh, here's a wall of
text, make sure the iptables output is exactly that". Although the
latter looks messier in the code, it's more precise, and it's easier
to update correctly when you change the rules. So just make all of the
tests do a check on the full iptables output.
(Note that I didn't double-check any of the output; I'm just assuming
that the output of the current iptables proxy code is actually
correct...)
Also, don't hardcode the expected number of rules in the metrics
tests, so that there's one less thing to adjust when rules change.
Also, use t.Run() in one place to get more precise errors on failure.
The test was sorting the iptables output so as to not depend on the
order that services get processed in, but this meant it wasn't
checking the relative ordering of rules (and in fact, the ordering of
the rules in the "expected" string was wrong, in a way that would
break things if the rules had actually been generated in that order).
Add a more complicated sorting function that sorts services
alphabetically while preserving the ordering of rules within each
service.
